<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[doctor-patient - Philip D. Cave]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/doctor-patient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/doctor-patient/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:45:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Doctor-Patient privilege]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/doctor-patient-privilege/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/doctor-patient-privilege/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[court-martial]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[doctor-patient]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal evidence review]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[military rules evidence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[UCMJ]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Federal Evidence Review notes the following: In conspiracy to distribute controlled substances prosecution, physician-defendant could not assert that the medical records of his patients were subject to a doctor-patient privilege because the federal courts do not recognize this privilege under FRE 501, in United States v. Bek, 493 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. July 6, 2007)&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Federal Evidence Review notes the following:</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
In conspiracy to distribute controlled substances prosecution, physician-defendant could not assert that the medical records of his patients were subject to a doctor-patient privilege because the federal courts do not recognize this privilege under FRE 501, in United States v. Bek, 493 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. July 6, 2007) (No. 05-4198)

 </p>
</blockquote>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
It is easy to overlook that the a physician-patient confidential communications privilege is not recognized in the trial of federal question matters. As adopted by Congress, the Federal Rules of Evidence fail to explicitly allow for this privilege.

</p>
</blockquote>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>