<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[homsexual - Philip D. Cave]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/homsexual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/homsexual/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:45:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[NMCCA on judge partiality]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/nmcca-on-judge-partiality/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/nmcca-on-judge-partiality/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Up Periscope]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[homsexual]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The up and down case of United States v. Hayes, has been decided again by NMCCA. Appellant has gained a new sentencing hearing because the NMCCA is convinced the judge was not impartial when adjudging a sentence. This is another one of those cases which arose because of comments during a bridging the gap talk&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>The up and down case of <em>United States v. Hayes</em>, has been decided again by NMCCA.  Appellant has gained a new sentencing hearing because the NMCCA is convinced the judge was not impartial when adjudging a sentence.  This is another one of those cases which arose because of comments during a bridging the gap talk with the MJ.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Pending NMCCA argument]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/pending-nmcca-argument/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/pending-nmcca-argument/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[New Cases]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[court-martial]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dadt]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[homsexual]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[nmcca]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[UCMJ]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>For various reasons the issue of homosexuality and DADT has been in the news for a while. The results of the various surveys to servicemembers and familys are still pending. Tomorrow, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. Hayes: I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S COMMENTS ON THE RECORD AND DURING THE “BRIDGING THE&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>For various reasons the issue of homosexuality and DADT has been in the news for a while.  The results of the various surveys to servicemembers and familys are still pending.</p>


<p>Tomorrow, NMCCA will hear oral argument in <em>United States v. Hayes</em>:</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S COMMENTS ON THE RECORD AND DURING THE “BRIDGING THE GAP” DISCUSSIONS WITH COUNSEL REFLECT AN ACTUAL BIAS AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S SEXUAL ORIENTATION, RESULTING IN THE MILITARY JUDGE’S DISQUALIFICATION FROM PRESIDING OVER APPELLANT’S COURT-MARTIAL?

 
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S COMMENTS ON THE RECORD AND DURING THE “BRIDGING THE GAP” DISCUSSIONS WITH COUNSEL CREATED AN APPEARANCE OF BIAS AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S SEXUAL ORIENTATION, RESULTING IN THE MILITARY JUDGE’S DISQUALIFICATION FROM PRESIDING OVER APPELLANT’S COURT-MARTIAL?

 </p>
</blockquote>


<p><a href="https://www.jag.navy.mil/courts/documents/archive/2008/HAYES%20T%20L%20%20200600910%20UNPUB%20OP.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Here is a link to the original NMCCA decision</a>.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Up periscope]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/up-periscope-68/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/up-periscope-68/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Up Periscope]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[grade reduction]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[homsexual]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kate wiltrout]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[mistreatment]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sack-tapping]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[toussaint]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[virginia pilot]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Huffington Post is reporting on the Toussaint case. A senior chief who was censured by the Secretary of the Navy for hazing sailors under his command may retire with a full pension, Navy officials say. Since it was announced last October, the terms of Michael Toussaint’s retirement have come under scrutiny that is unprecedented for&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/navy-chief-accused-of-haz_b_692831" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Huffington Post is reporting on the Toussaint case</a>.
</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>A senior chief who was censured by the Secretary of the Navy for hazing sailors under his command may retire with a full pension, Navy officials say.

Since it was announced last October, the terms of Michael Toussaint’s retirement have come under scrutiny that is unprecedented for an enlisted sailor. The senior chief petty officer, who from 2005 to 2006 led a Bahrain-based canine unit that was plagued by widespread documented abuse, denied much of his alleged misconduct in February during a retirement board hearing, a proceeding normally reserved for commissioned officers.

The case will soon go to the desk of an assistant secretary of the Navy, who faces a choice: to approve the unanimous recommendation of the three board members who said Toussaint deserves to retire with a senior chief’s pension; or to take a harder line and reduce him to a lower pay grade, as government lawyers had sought to do during the hearing.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
And the Virginia Pilot online reports:
</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>A Marine staff sergeant pleaded guilty Tuesday to mistreating 17 male subordinates by touching them in the groin, repeatedly making offensive sexual comments and gestures, and accusing them of being gay. . . . judge sentenced him to a year in confinement, reduction in rank and a bad conduct discharge.

In exchange for McCoy’s guilty plea, the government dropped 24 other charges against him, including 14 counts of sexual misconduct and three counts of assault.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
<a href="https://fcw.com/articles/2010/08/20/national-guard-bureau-gives-advice-on-what-not-to-write-on-facebook.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Federal Computer Week has this post about Facebook</a>.
</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>The National Guard Bureau is giving guard members specific guidance on how to control their privacy settings on Facebook and what to avoid publishing on social media sites.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
And on a different note, <a href="https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/japan/yokota-commander-puts-6-bars-off-limits-1.115885" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Stars & Stripes reports that</a>:
</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Citing “serious” crime in the area, Yokota’s base commander on Tuesday banned troops, dependents and Defense Department civilians from six bars in the already restricted entertainment district near Yokota’s main gate.</p>
</blockquote>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>