<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[adultery - Philip D. Cave]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/adultery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/tags/adultery/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:45:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Coastie O-6 headed to trial]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/coastie-o-6-headed-to-trial/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/coastie-o-6-headed-to-trial/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Up Periscope]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[adultery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[article 32]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[coast guard]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[court-martial]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[fraternization]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[UCMJ]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Navy Times reports that: A former sector commander in Alaska is facing a general court-marital for charges of adultery, fraternization and other sexual improprieties. Capt. Herbert “Mark” Hamilton III has been charged with 30 counts, including: failing to follow orders; lying to investigators; committing adultery with enlisted personnel; sending and receiving “sexual and amorous text&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Navy Times reports that:</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
A former sector commander in Alaska is facing a general court-marital for charges of adultery, fraternization and other sexual improprieties.

 
Capt. Herbert “Mark” Hamilton III has been charged with 30 counts, including: failing to follow orders; lying to investigators; committing adultery with enlisted personnel; sending and receiving “sexual and amorous text messages” using a government cell phone; photographing sexual acts; downloading and storing sexually explicit material on his government-issued laptop; and making an official phone call “while engaged in sexual activity,” according to charging documents.

 
Coast Guard Rear Adm. Christopher Colvin, 17th District commander, has referred the matter to a court-martial July 21, according to Lt. Cmdr. Greg Versaw, a staff attorney for the 17th District. A motions hearing will be held April 5.

 </p>
</blockquote>


<p>See <a href="/">here for prior posts</a> about the Article 32, UCMJ, process in the case.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Discipline under new pregnancy rules]]></title>
                <link>https://www.court-martial.com/blog/discipline-under-new-pregnancy-rules/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.court-martial.com/blog/discipline-under-new-pregnancy-rules/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip D. Cave]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Up Periscope]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[adultery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[court-martial]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[fraternization]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[UCMJ]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Seven U.S. soldiers, including three men, have already been punished under six-week-old rules making pregnancy a violation of military law in northern Iraq. Stars & Stripes reports. The four soldiers who became pregnant were given letters of reprimand that will not remain a part of the permanent military file, Cucolo said, as were two of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
Seven U.S. soldiers, including three men, have already been punished under six-week-old rules making pregnancy a violation of military law in northern Iraq.

 </p>
</blockquote>


<p>Stars & Stripes reports.</p>


<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> 
The four soldiers who became pregnant were given letters of reprimand that will not remain a part of the permanent military file, Cucolo said, as were two of the male soldiers.

 
The third male soldier, a noncommissioned officer who is married and impregnated a subordinate who is not his wife, was also charged with fraternization and given a permanent letter of reprimand, Cucolo said.

 
One of the female soldiers declined to say who impregnated her and the unit “let it drop,” Cucolo said, adding that he had no plans to further investigate paternity.

 </p>
</blockquote>


<p>While <a href="https://sexcrimes.typepad.com/sex_crimes/2009/12/yes-criminal-adultery-statutes-still-exist.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Prof. Cory Yung reports</a>: New Hampshire may finally eliminate their criminal adultery statute from the book.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>