Kaiserslautern, Germany: Representative Case Results

Outcomes at or Involving Kaiserslautern, Germany

U.S. v. O-5

An Army Lieutenant Colonel is accused of violating a military protective order (MPO) and obstruction of justice for contacts with his wife and children.  Court-martial charges are preferred against the officer and referred to a general court-martial.  Mr. Freeburg files a motion arguing to the military judge that the MPO was unlawful and interfered with the client’s Constitutional rights without a sufficient basis.  Mr. Freeburg appears in court and provides additional arguments in support of the motion.  The judge agrees!  Consequently, the Army dismisses all court-martial charges!

Result: Charges Dismissed. No Federal Conviction, No Dismissal.

U.S. v. E-7 United States Army

An E-7 with nearly 25 years of service was accused of strangling his wife on four different occasions (aggravated assault), burning her with a frying pan and twice making a serious threat.  Mr. Freeburg investigated the case and determined that the allegations were made in the context of a custody dispute and developed a gameplan to cross-examine the alleged victim on her motivations at trial.  Despite the prosecution introducing supposed photos of injuries and testimony from an expert in strangulation, the Soldier was acquitted of all charges of aggravated assault and making threats and only convicted of one lesser included offense of misdemeanor battery.

Result: Full Acquittal on All Serious Charges, No Confinement, Retirement Preserved.

Facing an Investigation or Charges Here?

Early action matters. We can coordinate with military defense counsel, preserve evidence, and fight for the best possible outcome at every stage.

Disclaimer: All cases are different. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. We do not promise any particular result.