Avvo Rating Top Attorney
Avvo Rating badge
Federal Bar Association
Virginia State Bar
Department of the Army

UCMJ Pretrial Investigations

Is There Probable Cause

An Article 32, UCMJ, investigation must be conducted if the intent is to prosecute you at general court-martial. You can waive the investigation, but that’s a serious question that needs careful consideration with your military defense lawyer.

Beginning in January 2015, there are to be new procedures which significantly reduce an accused’s ability to defend themselves in the event of a trial. Note however that if you are accused of a crime that is alleged to have happened before January 2015, there are some significant legal and constitutional questions to be evaluated on your behalf with your military defense lawyer.

Prior to January 2015, Article 32, UCMJ, investigations were a very robust formal hearing to determine if there were reasonable grounds to believe a crime was committed and that you committed it, and if so, what to do about it. The Fifth -Amendment constitutional right to grand jury indictment does not apply to the Armed Forces. So, Article 32 of the UCMJ (Section 832 of Title 10, United States Code), was enacted to require a thorough and impartial investigation of charges before they may be referred to a general court-martial.

The investigation was originally intended to have a twofold purpose: a discovery proceeding for the accused and a bulwark against baseless charges. – read, a bulwark against false accusations. United States v Nichols, 8 U.S.C.M.A. 119, 23 C.M.R. 343; cf. Wood v United States, 128 F2d 265 (DC Cir. 1942); United States v Zerbst, 111 F. Supp. 807 (D.C.E.D.S.C. 1953).

That is no longer the case, Congress has seen to that. Congress has taken away what was a significant improvement over civilian law designed to protect military personnel from unlawful command influence and false allegations. It appears you will not have an early right to discovery of the evidence against you and there are greater risks of being blind-sided at trial.

Dealing with these new restrictions is where an experienced military defense lawyer on your side is necessary.

Call or email for a consultation

Client Reviews
Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my family. Philip was so helpful, truly a calming force, and his legal help was invaluable to me, I am so thankful that I availed myself of his services! Rob
Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're exactly spot on. He is my hero and thanks to him I gave my life back... Bryan
Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to him. He genuinely cared about me and made my case his priority. He used all his experience and knowledge to put forth a good defense. I am very pleased with him and will recommend him to anyone in need of an attorney. Crystal