Articles Posted in Discovery

Discovery issues.
Philip D. Cave

There’s at least one federal judge who likes to enforce discovery where the prosecution has a – in my words – self executing duty to produce. Federal Judge Questions Prosecution Conduct in Ye Gon Case. “This is the second time in less than three months in a high profile case where the Department of Justice…

Continue reading ›
Juvenile convictions
Philip D. Cave

Are juvenile convictions subject to discovery and potential use at trial? — Yes. Mil. R. Evid. 609(d): Evidence of juvenile adjudications is generally not admissible under this rule. The military judge, however, may allow evidence of a juvenile adjudication of a witness other than the accused if conviction of the offense would be admissible to…

Continue reading ›
Prosecution failure to provide credibility related discovery on their witnesses.
Philip D. Cave

A recent Ninth Circuit case highlights the importance of disclosing impeachment evidence and the consequences of failing to do so. The prosecutor requested a criminal history check on a key government witness. The prosecutor indicated he was unaware of the criminal history which was not disclosed to the defense. The defendant was convicted and subsequently…

Continue reading ›
Discovery of “confidential” information
Philip D. Cave

D.C. Circuit remands case for district court to determine which company records, including from an internal investigation, were material to the defendant’s defense “and to protect against the public disclosure of material documents in a manner consistent with Thompson’s right to a fair trial,” in United States v. Thompson, __ F.3d __ (D.C. Cir. April…

Continue reading ›
More on discovery
Philip D. Cave

The prosecution of Senator Stevens highlighted problems with prosecutors who don’t comply with their Brady-plus obligations. Here’s another one. New Trial Granted Because of Prosecutor Misconduct: Mike Scarcella writes at Blog of the Legal Times that a D.C. Superior Court judge has granted a new trial to a man convicted of fatally stabbing another man…

Continue reading ›
Exclusion of video-tape deposition under Crawford.
Philip D. Cave

This case could be very helpful to an accused overseas where the prosecution lets witnesses go PCS or off active duty prior to trial, with the idea that the deposition or Article 32, UCMJ, hearing testimony could be used. Note, this case doesn’t talk about MLAT’s. The government’s minimal efforts to contact an “unavailable” witness…

Continue reading ›
Threats by clients
Philip D. Cave

Here is a post from Legal Blogwatch: Here is a scenario that sounds like a law school exam question. It was after midnight when the client began to leave a series of six messages on the lawyer’s answering machine. In the first, the client said that he knew the home address of the Juvenile Court…

Continue reading ›
Do military (DoD) lawyers know the meaning of “Brady material?”
Philip D. Cave

Personally, from experience, I’m not sure they do. However, Judge Emmett Sullivan, of the D.C. for D.C. doesn’t think so. Here is an item on The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes, Judge Threatens Justice Lawyers With Contempt Over Detainee Documents, 13 March 2009. So-called Brady rules require prosecutors to hand over information to defense attorneys…

Continue reading ›
Recent A.F.C.C.A. opinions
Philip D. Cave

Yesterday (090209) A.F.C.C.A. updated its online opinions. There are three worth reading for the trial practitioner. United States v. Curran, ACM 37185 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 22 January 2009). This is an interesting issue where the prosecution was allowed to introduce evidence on sentencing about the time and effort involved to investigate the allegations against…

Continue reading ›
The Prosecutor’s Gamble.
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Jones, No. 07-10289-MLW, 2009 U.S. Dis. LEXIS 6434 (D. Mass. 21 January 2009).* Prosecutors do this all the time. Prosecutors either fail to provide discovery or do so in a slow-rolling fashion. As the recent decision in Jones illustrates, it’s a gamble. The gamble is that provided there is no showing of…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message