What Are Your Intentions?: Sixth Circuit Finds No Plain Error In DEA Agents Drug Quantity Testimony Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that No expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of a defendant in a criminal case may state an opinion or inference as to whether the defendant did or…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in Evidence
In prosecution for first-degree murder and for using a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, testimony that defendant threatened two percipient witnesses at the scene of the crime were admissible under FRE 404(b) to show consciousness of guilt, in United States v. Begay, _ F.3d _ (9th Cir. June 1, 2009) (No.…
Continue reading ›United States v. Miller, __ M.J. ___, No. 08-0580/AR (C.A.A.F. June 10, 2009). Let’s get the nub of the case from CAAFLog’s summary. Judge Ryan writes for a unanimous court. The issue is “whether the Courts of Criminal Appeals, after finding the evidence factually insufficient to support a finding of guilty to a charged violation…
Continue reading ›Here is a link to Prof. Colin Miller’s site. The Areas Of My Expertise: Alabama Federal Court Allows Expert Eyewitness Testimony Despite Eleventh Circuit Precedent. Professor Miller discusses an 11th Circuit decision allowing expert testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identifications. The court allowed testimony about problems with identifications, but did not allow testimony that…
Continue reading ›Oh well, back from vacation. Lot’s to catch up on. Here is an interesting article: Anthony E. Giardino, COMBAT VETERANS, MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, AND THE DEATH PENALTY: ADDRESSING THE IMPACT OF POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 2955 (2009).
Continue reading ›I’ve already commented on breath tests. Are military breath tests reliable? Is the Intoxilyzer 5000 racially and genetically biased? Here is a new case and continuing discussion which potentially excludes evidence of the Intoxilyzer 5000, a device found to be used frequently at military bases. The issue is actually one of discovery. Supreme Court Of…
Continue reading ›A recent Ninth Circuit case highlights the importance of disclosing impeachment evidence and the consequences of failing to do so. The prosecutor requested a criminal history check on a key government witness. The prosecutor indicated he was unaware of the criminal history which was not disclosed to the defense. The defendant was convicted and subsequently…
Continue reading ›United States v. Crabtree, No. 08-4411, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10720(4th Cir. May 19, 2009). In a published opinion the Fourth Circuit sides with the majority of federal circuit courts of appeal that there is no government “clean hands” exception to the receipt into evidence of unlawfully taped telephone calls. Daniel Crabtree was sentenced to…
Continue reading ›Here is Prof. Colin Miller’s comment on United States v. Yammine, decided by the NMCCA recently. Does Child Pornography=Child Molestation?: Military Court Finds Child Pornography Evidence Was Properly Admitted As Character Evidence
Continue reading ›Here’s a new law review article to go along with my rants about how prosecution expert and forensic evidence can be biased, it’s difficult to deal with, and the system allows the problem. Volume 95, Issue 1 Brandon L. Garrett and Peter J. Neufeld, Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions, 95 Va. L. Rev.…
Continue reading ›




