Civilian counsel don’t always get paid by the client. Rather, it oftentimes can be the parents or a family member. Technology and other innovations have brought us crowdfunding and organizations set up to help defray legal fees for a court-martial accused. I recently participated in a Zoom discussion about this topic and its ethical concerns.
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in Uncategorized
For your reading. R. Michael Cassidy, Character, Credibility and Rape Shield Rules. RESEARCH PAPER 542, Boston College Law School, October 8, 2020. Cassidy’s introduction notes the attention sexual assaults have received over recent years in reference to Harvey Weinstein, Justice Kavanaugh, and even then VP Biden. He goes on to say that, “It is a…
Continue reading ›https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB5SXp95b-c
Continue reading ›“Thinking about bringing marijuana on base? Weed rather you didn’t,” the Naval Submarine Base posted on Facebook on July 1, the day possession of marijuana became legal in Connecticut. “State law legalizing possession of marijuana doesn’t apply to military installations.” A few weeks later, the sub base posted a graphic with the message, “We’re going…
Continue reading ›A servicemember can refuse to take a COVID vaccine–BUT there are potential disciplinary consequences. Military law is clear that a servicemember can be ordered to submit to vaccinations. This happens at the beginning of enlistment when you are required to have or get certain vaccinations. This is a long-standing practice when reporting to MEPS for…
Continue reading ›We all have clients who have been ordered to enter their passwords to their cellphone so the investigators can forensically examine the phone. As military defense counsel we frequently have these issues come up. In 2018 there were an estimated 396 million smartphones and cellphone accounts nationwide. Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. ___, 138…
Continue reading ›We all have clients anxious to know their SOR status post-conviction. We are required to, at minimum, advise them of the DoD regulation when there is a guilty plea for charges which might require registration. But clients are never satisfied. Here is one case that might have some relevance to registrant’s in South Carolina. The…
Continue reading ›There was a time when having adverse information in a restricted folder in the official record meant something in terms of lasting effect of that information. Over time that changed if the officer was selected for promotion. A post-selection screen was then made of everything before forwarding the officer’s name for promotion. Now, Army officer…
Continue reading ›Colorado v. Johnson, No. 2021 CO 35, 396 P.3d ____ (2021), requires us to visit the Hobson’s choice where you have successfully had evidence or statements suppressed but there is much value added if the client testifies. The issue then becomes one of potential impeachment with the suppressed evidence. Mil. R. Evid. 304(e)(1) gives us…
Continue reading ›In United States v. Schloff, we had an issue with extraneous influences in the “jury” room. The two senior members essentially argued that the Army reputation for dealing with sexual assaults was relevant to their findings–and a guilty result ensued. At the beginning of deliberations on findings of appellant’s court-martial, the president and senior ranking…
Continue reading ›




