Articles Posted in Uncategorized

Old client
Philip D. Cave

What happens after trial. Here is another case of mine that found itself in federal court–United States v. Mingo. When the Feds tell you to register and follow the rules they mean it. In January 2005, Mingo enlisted in the United States Army. See Sealed Complaint at 2, United States v. Mingo, No. 16 Cr.…

Continue reading ›
And again
Philip D. Cave

NMCCA has an unpublished opinion in United States v. Allen. “We have written often to urge convening authorities and their staff judge advocates [SJAs] to pay scrupulous attention to detail throughout the post trial process. This case compels us to reiterate that urging yet again.” [1] Unfortunately, this is not a new problem in the…

Continue reading ›
After the court is over
Philip D. Cave

What happened after—trial, CCA review, and in the case below at CAAF. From time to time I find it interesting to follow habeas cases involving a military petitioner. So, here is Santucci v. Commandant, No. 19-3116-JWL (D.C. Kan. May 26, 2020). The ACCA decision. The CAAF decision without opinion, is at 2017 CAAF LEXIS 522…

Continue reading ›
Double jeopardy at CAAF
Philip D. Cave

Colonel Rice was arrested for possession and distribution of CP. He was convicted in federal court and at court-martial. That is why we have a CAAF decision in United States v. Rice, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. May 21, 2020). I think part of the takeaway here is that the Government can’t charge under Clause (1)…

Continue reading ›
Corroboration is important
Philip D. Cave

John E. Reid & Associates agree that more is needed than a simple “I did it.” The reported interrogations of some of these suspects involved physical coercion, duress and outright torture. While the Supreme Court has consistently prohibited such interrogation practices, evidently the trial courts rejected the defendant’s claim that their confession was false. Traditionally,…

Continue reading ›
Forensics
Philip D. Cave

From Prof. Miller. Thursday, April 30, 2020 Thompson & Casarez on Blind Testing and Forensic Sciences By CrimProf BlogEditor Sandra Guerra Thompson and Nicole B. Casarez (University of Houston Law Center and University of St. Thomas) have posted Solving Daubert’s Dilemma for the Forensic Sciences Through Blind Testing (57 Houston Law Review 617 (2020)) on…

Continue reading ›
A quickie on UMC
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Martin, ACCA April 2020. On appeal, Appellant argued that six separate convictions of Art. 107 were UMC under the circumstances, but Appellant’s UMC claim never gets off the ground. Appellant contends that because the “criminality behind” his Article 107 convictions was not the statements themselves, but rather the fact that appellant made…

Continue reading ›
Digital evidence suppressed
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Taylor, NMCCA 30 April 2020 is a government appeal of a judge’s ruling to suppress evidence. [T]he military judge granted a Defense motion to suppress evidence resulting from the searches of 12 of Appellee’s electronic devices. We are asked to decide whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal and, if so, whether…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message