How far should members of congress or the President, or anyone, get involved in how to prosecute Major Hasan for his acts at Fort Hood. Certainly the victims are entitled to be involved and are required to be through the Department of Defense Victim-Witness Assistance Program. The program does not give politicians or government officials…
Continue reading ›A question arises for Major Hasan and the court-martial about venue or situs or trial at Fort Hood or somewhere else. Here is the general rule from R.C.M. 906(b)(11), for a change of venue of a court-martial: United States v. Curtis was at one time a death penalty case, but not anymore as a result…
Continue reading ›The Christian Science Monitor reports and makes this observation: But emerging evidence that Hasan may have terrorist connections could alter the prosecutorial strategy, as his story would hold invaluable information for investigators. One way to get that information would be to offer Hasan a deal – such as revoking the death penalty if he’ll fill…
Continue reading ›WOAI.com reports: A former military nurse will be court-martialed for allegedly killing three terminally ill patients at the Air Force’s largest hospital. Capt. Michael Fontana is set to enter a plea in September at Lackland Air Force Base, near San Antonio. The military announced Tuesday that a trial date will also be set. Charges have…
Continue reading ›So which CID agents are violating Article 92, UCMJ? And if they are lawyers on the government side, which lawyers are violating Article 92, UCMJ, and ethics rules for lawyers in the Army regarding pretrial publicity? officials told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the case…
Continue reading ›Online Newshour reports: And it doesn’t have to be all 12 members voting him guilty. Two-thirds to convict is enough. And it does have to be unanimous to give him the death penalty. In a death penalty case the members have to be unanimous on a finding of guilty. The unanimity requirement different than for…
Continue reading ›How the Military Will Try Nidal Hasan This reminds me of A Few Good Men. Remember, in the Navy court-room the Army JAG symbol is on the podium. Well here they have a picture of courtroom A at Marine Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan. We know the picture’s about a year old because the major pictured…
Continue reading ›There is a great deal of pontificating on both sides of the aisle about Major Hasan, Fort Hood, and intelligence failures. Here is a rational discussion and perspective. In last week’s global security and intelligence report, we discussed the recent call by the leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Nasir al-Wahayshi, for jihadists…
Continue reading ›An official news release from Fort Hood PAO states that: The charges filed against Hasan include 13 specifications of premeditated murder, in violation of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, (emphasis added). hat-tip to CAAFLog. The media has been speculating all afternoon based on a CID news conference. I would not imagine CID to…
Continue reading ›Here’s the question, I think. Military.com, as with many other media outlets are reporting: Nidal Malik Hasan’s overly zealous religious views and strange behavior worried the doctors overseeing his medical training, but they saw no evidence that he was violent or a threat. The question, a legitimate question, has been raised about Major Hasan’s mental…
Continue reading ›
