Articles Posted in Up Periscope

Up periscope 150
Philip D. Cave

Houston Chronicle reports: An Army witness who says he stumbled onto a fellow soldier killing a U.S. superior at their patrol base in Iraq testified Monday he thought he was running toward nighttime enemy fire as he responded to gunshots — until he heard the shooter shout “I’ll kill you” in English and saw his…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read, about ethics, sorry no CLE credit
Philip D. Cave

‘Waiving’ Goodbye to Rights: Plea Bargaining and the Defense Dilemma of Competent Representation Jane Campbell Moriarty University of Akron School of Law Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2011 U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-7 Abstract: The proposed amendments to the ABA Criminal Justice Standards for Prosecutors and Defense Lawyers…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read on SBS
Philip D. Cave

Deborah Tuerkheimer, Science-Dependent Prosecution and the Problem of Epistemic Contingency: A Study of Shaken Baby Syndrome, 62 ALABAMA L. REV. 513 (2011). With rare exception, SBS prosecutions rest entirely on the testimony of medical experts. The construction of crime in this manner is rather extraordinary, particularly since— as a general proposition—scientific understandings develop over time.…

Continue reading ›
The Burleson trail
Philip D. Cave

On 21 October 2008 the NMCCA decided and affirmed in United States v. Burleson, 2008 CCA LEXIS 386. In the original case he was sentenced to: The appellant was sentenced to 20 years confinement, total forfeitures, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. On 18…

Continue reading ›
Fasler
Philip D. Cave

Here is another Fasler trailer. Until Fasler is resolved the prosecution should be pleading in accordance with the issue in Fasler – what’s the harm – it’s a few extra words. WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME…

Continue reading ›
What if the client confesses
Philip D. Cave

What do you do, if anything, if your client confesses to a crime for which he is not charged, but someone else is, or where someone else has already been convicted. Not a common practice in the military, or is it. What about the multi-accused drug case for example? Here’s an interesting article about the…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

Army Times reports that: The intelligence analyst suspected of illegally passing government secrets to the WikiLeaks website has been found competent to stand trial, the Army said Friday. And of course the Daily News reports he’s no longer in “solitary.” Law.com has this interesting piece about the “struggle” courts have with searches of smartphones. Bottom…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message