Articles Posted in Up Periscope

No bar
Philip D. Cave

The Army will soon begin mandatory discharge processing for any Soldier or officer convicted of a sexual assault. There is no bar to how far they will go back in the persons career, and also it appears it will not matter if the person was allowed to reenlist. Separation proceedings for the soldiers will be…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

CrimLawProfBlog brings a link to a summary of last year’s criminal law cases at the Supremes. The Supreme Court 2012 Term was one in which the Court tackled several of the most critical issues that arise in our criminal justice system. Perhaps most importantly, as the 50th Anniversary of the Court’s decision in Gideon v.…

Continue reading ›
Human error
Philip D. Cave

A little off topic, but still a useful reminder for drug or DUI cases in the military. From the L.A. Times: Crime lab officials said the “human error” occurred over nearly five months and led to mistakes in the forensic examination of blood alcohol content. But they insist the miscalculations were so few that they…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

The aftermath of Tailhook is well documented, as is the connection to potential fallout to the innocent. See Kingsley R. Browne, Military Sex Scandals from Tailhook to the Present: The Cure Can Be Worse Than The Disease, 14 DUKE L. J. GENDER & POL. 749 (2007). http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=djglp

Continue reading ›
He lied, he lied, he lied
Philip D. Cave

Not an uncommon trial counsel theme when a client has testified. Recently, the Fourth Circuit considers a prosecutor’s closing argument based on the trial evidence in which the defendant “lied” under oath; circuit notes again that this argument is improper, although the error in this case did not constitute plain error, in United States v.…

Continue reading ›
The continuing problems of law enforcement testimony
Philip D. Cave

Be it context, or something else such as human lie detector testimony, prosecutors often seek to go too far with law enforcement testimony. Second Circuit highlights two important issues concerning law enforcement testimony: first, an officer may not provide lay testimony that is based upon “specialized training and experience”; and second, expert opinion testimony is…

Continue reading ›
Spoilation of evidence
Philip D. Cave

Does this happen – has it happened to you? The complaining witness has a Facebook or other social media page, or texts on their phone, or emails — and they complaining witness decides to delete them (or does so because law enforcement or a “victim advocate” tells them to). Why is this not spoilation of…

Continue reading ›
Testimony too far
Philip D. Cave

After an extensive investigation involving numerous intercepted recordings, to what extent can an agent provide opinion testimony about the meaning of the recordings? In reversing a conviction for a murder for hire conspiracy, the Sixth Circuit joins five other circuits (Second, Fourth, Eighth, Ninth and D.C.) in disallowingFRE 701 to permit an investigating officer to…

Continue reading ›
Preserving error
Philip D. Cave

A trial is intended to be a win at the trial level. Good trial lawyers never litigate just for an appeal, but at the same time must remember to preserve error for appellate review in case. The Military Rules of Evidence allow for admission of obectionable hearsay (evidence) in some situations. Usually that is a…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message