Worth the read is a pending Supreme Court petition that may have impact on military cases. Issue: Whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce an out-of-court, testimonial translation, without making the translator available for confrontation and cross-examination. That is the issue in Ye v. United States, a history of which can be found…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in Witness issues
· Police can tell when a suspect is lying · People confess only when they have actually committed the crime they are being charged with · Most judges and jurors fully understand court instructions · Eye-witnesses are always the most reliable source of case-related information · Most mentally ill individuals are violent · All psychopaths…
Continue reading ›http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/299443.php While numerous studies have hailed mindfulness meditation for its potential benefits for the mind and body, new research suggests it may have a negative impact on memory. While mindfulness meditation is believed to be beneficial for the mind and body, researchers say the practice may impair the ability to accurately recall memories. Published in…
Continue reading ›(W)e seem to be on an endless quest to unmask the deceiver. This is easier said than done. The research is surprising. Even the professionals aren’t very good at catching people in a lie. When we do catch a lie, it’s often not for the reasons you may expect. There is no “Pinocchio’s nose”. That…
Continue reading ›We do a lot of military sexual assault cases with alcohol involved. It is not unusual for a complaining witness to claim they were drunk, blacked out and didn’t consent. First, if blacked out they can’t know they didn’t consent–it’s impossible if they were blacked out, rather than them exhibiting a convenient and selective memory.…
Continue reading ›The NMCCA has issued an interesting published opinion on a government appeal. United States v. Rios. From the opinion. The appellee is currently facing trial by special court-martial on numerous charges regarding larceny from the Marine Corps Exchange (MCX) on Camp Pendleton, California. He is alleged to have conspired with his wife to commit larceny[.]…
Continue reading ›Regardless of the type of case, motive to falsely testify of a primary witness is almost always of some relevance. The recent case of Nappi v. Yelich, from the Tenth highlights that. The Sixth Amendment’s confrontation right, which applies equally to defendants in state prosecutions, “means more than being allowed to confront the witness physically.”…
Continue reading ›Are you at a base overseas? Do you have foreign national witnesses or foreign language documents as evidence in your case? United States v. Aifang Ye, No. 12-10576 (9th Cir. 2015) may be of interest to you. The court held that the defendant’s argument that the government’s failure to call certain translators as witnesses at…
Continue reading ›As a defense counsel, I’m always looking for ways in which the prosecutor has opened the door to relevant evidence, but which for some reasons has been excluded or can’t be offered. MRE 412 comes to mind, as happened to me at trial in United States v. Savala, 70 M.J. 70 (C.A.A.F. 2011). But, BUT,…
Continue reading ›Under the “old” Article 32, the right to call and examine witnesses and to obtain production (discovery) of evidence was pretty robust. All Services except the Air Force and Coast Guard routinely recorded the audio of the hearing. That audio could then be transcribed into a verbatim transcript. The benefit to the government was that…
Continue reading ›




