Don’t ask, don’t tell

The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, enacted in 1993 under President Bill Clinton, represented a compromise allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals to serve in the U.S. military provided they did not disclose their sexual orientation. This policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted service members but mandated discharge for those who openly acknowledged their homosexuality. While intended as a progressive step, DADT effectively institutionalized secrecy, leading to the discharge of thousands solely based on their sexual orientation.

History

The repeal of DADT in 2011 allowed LGBTQ+ individuals to serve openly. However, many veterans discharged under DADT or prior policies continued to face challenges due to “other than honorable” discharge statuses, which impeded access to military benefits and affected civilian employment opportunities. Their discharge paperwork often explicitly cited their sexual orientation as the reason for separation, perpetuating stigma and discrimination post-service.

military.com

In response to these enduring injustices, a class-action lawsuit was filed in 2023, alleging that the Department of Defense’s maintenance of discharge records indicating sexual orientation violated constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process. The plaintiffs argued that such records unjustly stigmatized LGBTQ+ veterans and hindered their reintegration into civilian life.

military.com

A landmark settlement was reached in early 2025, wherein the Department of Defense agreed to establish a streamlined process for affected veterans to amend their discharge records. This process allows for the removal of any indicators of sexual orientation from DD-214 forms and facilitates the upgrade of discharge statuses to “honorable.” Such amendments are crucial for restoring veterans’ eligibility for benefits and employment opportunities.

military.com

This settlement reflects a broader commitment to rectifying past discriminatory practices within the military. By acknowledging and addressing the injustices faced by LGBTQ+ service members, the Department of Defense aims to honor their service and ensure equitable treatment for all veterans.

military.com

LGBTQ+ individuals have served in the U.S. military since the nation’s founding, often in secrecy. Over time, military policies evolved from outright exclusion to limited tolerance, culminating in full inclusion. Below is a detailed historical overview with scholarly and historical sources.

Early Military Service and Policies (1775–1940s)

Revolutionary War to Civil War (1775–1865)

• No formal military policies banned LGBTQ+ individuals during this period, but homosexuality was criminalized under general moral laws.
• The Articles of War (1775), the first military legal code, included sodomy prohibitions borrowed from British military law (Canaday, 2009).
• During the Civil War, there were instances of same-sex relationships, but they were rarely documented due to societal taboos (Berube, 1990).

World War I (1914–1918)

• The military began psychiatric screenings to exclude homosexual individuals, viewing them as “mentally unfit” (Shilts, 1993).
• These screenings were inconsistent, allowing many LGBTQ+ individuals to serve without issue.
• After the war, military discharges for homosexuality increased due to growing medicalization of sexual orientation (Canaday, 2009).

World War II (1939–1945)

• The U.S. military intensified its efforts to identify and discharge gay service members (Berube, 1990).
• A “blue discharge” system (neither honorable nor dishonorable) was used disproportionately for gay individuals, depriving them of GI Bill benefits (Canaday, 2009).
• Women suspected of being lesbians, particularly in the Women’s Army Corps (WACs), were also targeted, although less systematically than men (Shilts, 1993).

The Cold War and Early LGBTQ+ Purges (1945–1980s)

Korean War and the McCarthy Era (1950s)

• The Lavender Scare (a parallel to the Red Scare) led to purges of LGBTQ+ individuals from the military and government (Johnson, 2004).
• President Eisenhower’s Executive Order 10450 (1953) banned LGBTQ+ individuals from federal employment, including military service (Dean, 2001).
• More than 5,000 service members were discharged in the 1950s for homosexuality (Shilts, 1993).

Vietnam War and the 1970s

• The need for personnel led to more lenient enforcement of gay bans during the Vietnam War (Shilts, 1993).
• Many LGBTQ+ individuals served in silence, while some used homosexuality as a means to avoid the draft (Howard, 2014).
• Despite increased visibility of LGBTQ+ rights movements, military policy remained hostile (Canaday, 2009).

The 1980s–1990s: The AIDS Crisis and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

Reagan and Bush Administrations (1980s)

• In 1982, the Department of Defense issued Directive 1332.14, stating homosexuality was incompatible with military service (Shilts, 1993).
• The HIV/AIDS epidemic led to additional discrimination, as HIV-positive service members faced discharge (Berube, 1990).
• LGBTQ+ activism against the ban increased, particularly as many veterans found themselves dishonorably discharged (Howard, 2014).

Clinton and the Creation of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (1993)

• President Bill Clinton sought to lift the ban on LGBTQ+ service but faced opposition from Congress and military leaders.
• “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) was implemented as a compromise, allowing LGBTQ+ individuals to serve as long as they did not disclose their sexual orientation.
• Despite intentions to protect LGBTQ+ service members, DADT led to over 13,000 discharges from 1994 to 2011 (Frank, 2010).

The 2000s–Present: Repeal, Inclusion, and Transgender Rights

Obama Administration and the Repeal of DADT (2010–2011)

• In 2010, Congress passed legislation to repeal DADT, signed into law by President Barack Obama.
• The policy officially ended in September 2011, allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual service members to serve openly (Belkin, 2012).

Transgender Military Service and Trump-Era Restrictions (2016–2021)

• In 2016, the Obama administration lifted the ban on transgender individuals serving.
• President Donald Trump reversed this in 2017, banning most transgender individuals from serving (Gleason, 2019).
• The policy took effect in 2019, preventing transgender troops from accessing medical transition care.

Biden Administration and Full Inclusion (2021–Present)

• In 2021, President Joe Biden overturned the Trump-era ban, restoring the right of transgender individuals to serve openly (McNamara, 2022).
• Efforts have continued to upgrade discharges for LGBTQ+ veterans affected by past discriminatory policies.

Conclusion

The history of LGBTQ+ individuals in the military reflects broader societal struggles for equality. Over time, military policies evolved from strict exclusion to conditional tolerance and eventual inclusion. While full equality has been achieved on paper, many veterans continue to fight for recognition and benefits lost due to past discrimination.

• Belkin, A. (2012). How We Won: Progressive Lessons from the Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. Hachette Books.
• Berube, A. (1990). Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War II. Free Press.
• Canaday, M. (2009). The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton University Press.
• Dean, R. (2001). Imperial Brotherhood: Gender and the Making of Cold War Foreign Policy. University of Massachusetts Press.
• Frank, N. (2010). Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Gleason, B. (2019). “The Impact of Trump’s Transgender Military Ban,” Journal of Military and Veteran Studies, 7(2).
• Howard, C. (2014). Pride and Prejudice: The History of LGBTQ+ Military Service. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, D. K. (2004). The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. University of Chicago Press.
• McNamara, S. (2022). “Biden’s Reversal of the Transgender Ban: Impacts and Challenges,” Military Review, 102(4).
• Shilts, R. (1993). Conduct Unbecoming: Gays and Lesbians in the U.S. Military. St. Martin’s Press.