Getting the cell phone

Philip D. Cave

As we see frequently, texts and messages on cellphones can be important evidence in a case. Most of the time the MCIO’s merely got the CW to provide a screenshot and otherwise cherry-pick what they want to take as evidence in the beginning. Of course the cherry-picking is in favor of the CW and they ignore what might be Brady-plus material. True, I’m starting to see more MCIO’s do a Cellbrite extraction, which is good.

United States v. Pham from the NMCCA teaches us that we need to be precise in what we ask for when we are seeking the CW’s phone.

Here, the CW “voluntarily provided her cell phone, a Samsung Galaxy S-IV, to NCIS for forensic examination. NCIS investigators performed a logical extraction of the phone and returned it to PI the same day. In response to a January 2016 defense discovery request for a copy of the physical extraction” the defense got “a logical extraction performed 11 months earlier.”

A defense expert consultant confirmed this disclosure. So the defense moved to compel a physical extraction of the CW’s “Samsung Galaxy S-IV” cell phone. “The defense asserted that the report derived from the logical extraction did not include deleted data, hidden data, or mobile applications data.”

The NCIS expert explained that he could not perform a physical extraction because a “Galaxy S-IV” was not a “rooted” phone. The evidence provided in support of the defense expert conclusion that a physical extraction could be performed was a “screenshot,” of an apparently earlier version of the phone, a “Galaxy SIII, Alfa,” and the screenshot indicated it was a “rooted” phone. Based upon this limited and contradictory evidence, we agree with the military judge that the appellant failed to sustain his burden of persuasion. Furthermore, there was no evidence submitted at trial or to date that in February 2015, when NCIS had control of PI’s cell phone, the technology existed to conduct a physical extraction of a Galaxy S-IV cell phone.

Cellebrite can now unlock iPhone 6 and 6+, also extract data from array of popular apps, according to cyberscoop.com.

What Happens When You Press that Button? — according to Cellbrite.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message