Humor in uniform lawyering

Philip D. Cave

The accused is charged with indecent assault on a complaining witness and rape on another complaining witness.

Member: Sir I’m the unit victim advocate. Individual voir dire continues blah, blah, blah.

Def: The defense objects on implied bias and liberal grant mandate.

MJ: Explain why please.

Def: Blah, blah, blah.

TC: The government objects to the defense challenge. There is no evidence of bias or potential bias, the member won’t be an expert in the deliberation room, and the public won’t have a warped perception of the system with an advocate for sexual assault victims being a member in a case of multiple sexual assaults.

MJ: Challenge denied.

And yes, under the current prosecution extremely favorable pro-government (made by and for the government, even though they have unlimited preemptory challenges in the initial selection process) rule the member was pre-empted and the challenge can’t be preserved.

From my trial notebook.

Sine qua non for a fair court-martial is members free of bias. A member shall be excused in cases of actual bias or implied bias. United States v. Napoleon, 46 M.J. 279, 282-83 (C.A.A.F. 1997); United States v. Minyard, 46 M.J. 229, 231 (1997); United States v. Daulton, 45 M.J. 212, 217 (1996); United States v. Harris, 13 M.J. 288, 292 (C.M.A. 1982). Implied bias. Implied bias when “most people in the same position would be prejudiced.” United States v. Armstrong, 54 M.J. 51, 53-54 (2000), quoting United States v. Warden, 51 M.J. 78, 81 (1999); United States v. Smart, 21 M.J. 15, 20 (C.M.A. 1985). Implied bias is viewed through the eyes of the public, focusing on the appearance of fairness. United States v. Townsend, 65 M.J. 460 (C.A.A.F. 2008), is newest case on implied bias, which again seems to cut back on the concept; as well as the liberal grant mandate. This is a good 2008 article on implied bias, Colonel Louis J. Puleo, Implied Bias: A Suggested Disciplined Methodology, Army Law., Mar. 2008, at 34.

Ultimately the issue wasn’t preserved because of an acquittal on the two sexual assault charges.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message