More on SOR

Philip D. Cave

Advising a client on SOR is difficult. They want specific answers and often you can’t give them more than general advice. There are several points I try to make with clients.

Title I of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), specifically includes certain Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) convictions in its definition of “sex offense.” Department of Defense Instruction 1325.07 contains the specific list of UCMJ convictions that require registration under SORNA1. Jurisdictions must ensure that all of the UCMJ convictions listed in DOD Instruction 1325.07 are included in their sex offender registration schemes. In 2015, SORNA was amended to require the Department of Defense to submit information to the National Sex Offender Registry and the National Sex Offender Public Website about any person adjudged of a covered sex offense via courts-martial or released from a military corrections facility after being incarcerated for such an offense. The Department of Defense continues to work on developing a system to meet its responsibilities under these new provisions, which are found in 34 U.S.C. § 20931.

SMART.

SOR laws change fairly regularly. That means a law may not apply to the client today, but the law may change a day after sentencing and registration is required or the change comes several years after. The Courts have generally rejected ex-post facto challenges (although there has been some movement under state constitutions.

  1. “Given the unique structure of the military justice system, state jurisdictions must determine which military convictions will be recognized as registerable offenses — and how they will be categorized. For example, a state-level requirement to register based on a conviction of a sex offense in “federal court” was held to also include a court-martial from a military court. Issues also arise when trying to compare uniquely military offenses that might have a sexual component — such as “Conduct Unbecoming an Officer” — to jurisdiction-level sex offenses. In at least one state, an offender convicted under article 134 of the UCMJ for an offense relating to child pornography was required to register because the offense of conviction was determined to be a “like violation” to a state offense.” https://www.smart.gov/caselaw/4-Case-Law-Update-2018-Residency-Military.pdf (useful references are attached to this article)
  2. A plea to an assault and battery as an LIO of a 120 sounds good. Be careful because some state may now or later decide it’s sufficiently “like” a state crime which requires registration.

The DoD IG Evaluation of compliance with SORNA (2014) is here.

32 CFR 635.6 requiring registration of offenders on base is here.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message