MRI as a lie detector

Philip D. Cave

There’s an interesting case going on in (southern California of course) where the defense is seeking to offer.

Defense attorneys are for the first time submitting a controversial neurological lie-detection test as evidence in U.S. court.digg_url =”http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/noliemri.html”; In an upcoming juvenile-sex-abuse case in San Diego, the defense is hoping to get an fMRI scan, which shows brain activity based on oxygen levels, admitted to prove the abuse didn’t happen. The technology is used widely in brain research, but hasn’t been fully tested as a lie-detection method.

Alexis Madrigal, MRI Lie Detection to Get First Day in Court, Wired Science, 16 March 2009.

Last week, I blogged about neuroscientists’ concerns about fMRI brain imaging. Critics say its scientific reliability and validity is far from established, and that if it was introduced in court, its colorful graphics might mislead jurors and judges and derail justice.

Just days later, the good folks over at the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences have learned of a pending case in California in which the “No Lie MRI” (I kid you not!) may be introduced in court to establish that a parent did not molest his child.

The case is a child protection hearing in juvenile court, so the records are sealed. The issue is whether a child should be removed from the home due to alleged sexual abuse by a parent, explains blogger Emily Murphy, a Stanford Law School fellow.


Karen Franklin, Wired Update on fMRI court case, In the News, 17 March 2009.
Karen Franklin, Beware “voodoo” brain science, In the News, 10 March 2009.

And from Deception Blog,

So depressing. Here’s the coverage so far:

  • Stanford Center for Law & the Biosciences Blog, it appears, broke the story (14 Mar).
  • Brief comments from the Neuroethics and Law Blog (15 Mar).
  • Detailed report from Wired Science in MRI Lie Detection to Get First Day in Court (16 Mar).
  • Karen Franklin’s In the News Blog offers further thoughts and links to previous posts on the limitations of fMRI for lie detection (16 Mar).
  • The company offering this service is No Lie MRI.
  • More from the Deception Blog on fMRI and lie detection including links to relevant academic research.
  • Is the MRI lie detector test reliable? ScienceLine reports (3 November 2008).

For 5,000 dollars, a computer will scan your brain several times while asking you a series of banal yes or no questions: Do you live in Texas? Is it 2004? It will also ask you one important question, such as: Did you burn down the shop? Or, have you cheated on your spouse? Shortly thereafter, it will spit out two numbers. And the creators of the test insist that those two numbers will determine if, when you answered the serious question, you were lying.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message