Court-Martial Trial Practice

Wikipedia as a reliable source
Philip D. Cave

Well, I use Wikipedia for research. But, I use it “in some limited situations . . . for getting a sense of a term’s common usage.” Fire Insurance Exchange v. Oltman & Blackner, Case No. 201004262-CA, 2012 UT App 230 (Utah App. 2012)(discussing the uses and reliability of Wikipedia as a source of information). See…

Continue reading ›
Stolen Valor
Philip D. Cave

http://verdict.justia.com/2012/08/17/teaching-and-learning-about-united-states-v-alvarez-the-stolen-valor-act-casehttp://verdict.justia.com/2012/08/17/teaching-and-learning-about-united-states-v-alvarez-the-stolen-valor-act-case

Continue reading ›
Denedo, Miller, Padilla . . .
Philip D. Cave

Deciding what to advise an accused about deportation or sex offender registration is easy (isn’t it). But, Aguilar-Turcios v. Holder, might lead to a different conclusion. Justia.com Opinion Summary: Petitioner, a native and citizen of Honduras and a lawful permanent resident alien of the United States, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

1. None of the Supreme Court Justices Has Battle Experience, Andrew Cohen, The Atlantic. This is the first of a two-part series on the Supreme Court and the military. Today’s article focuses on the military history of the men who later became justices. Part II will focus on the disconnect between the current Court and…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read-Scalia on reading
Philip D. Cave

Justice Scalia’s new book, “Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts,” is available. Here’s the puff piece from Amazon. In this groundbreaking book by best-selling authors Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner, all the most important principles of constitutional, statutory, and contractual interpretation are systematically explained in an engaging and informative style-including several hundred…

Continue reading ›
Impeachment by . . .
Philip D. Cave

So, let’s say that a witness answers a question during the Article 32, UCMJ, investigation, and then refuses to answer the same question at a subsequent trial? Does his answer at the Article 32, UCMJ investigation constitute a prior inconsistent statement under Rule 801(d)(1)(A)? Well, an Article 32, UCMJ, investigation is certainly an “other proceeding”…

Continue reading ›
Is the Art of Advocacy all wrong
Philip D. Cave

This is an academic book written in a very accessible style with limited jargon and lots of information as to what advocacy lore is supported (and what is not supported) by the research literature. The book covers a wide variety of topics: attorney demeanor, attorney verbal communication as well as paralinguistic and kinesic communications (all…

Continue reading ›
“Jury” matters
Philip D. Cave

The July issue of The Jury Expert is now on-line. There are several items of interest to the trial practitioner. I was always told: Tell ‘em what you’re going to tell ‘em; Tell ‘em; Tell ‘em what you told ‘em; Sit down. But now there’s a different perspective about what is characterized as, “an old…

Continue reading ›
Prior sexual assault allegations
Philip D. Cave

In trial of defendant for sexually abusing two minors, the admissibility of evidence that victims had made false accusation of sexual abuse against others was admissible, not under FRE 403, FRE 412, or 608(b), but rather under the Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, in United States v. Frederick, 683 F.3d 913 (8th Cir. July 5,…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message