Except in a slightly different context, but still a similar point. Errin Morris, Cognitive Biasl and Evaluation of Forensic Evidence, The Champion, NACDL, May 2012. Remember, USACIL and all the others get a full brief sheet on why the evidence should be tested and lots of facts. The subsequent testing is not done in the…
Continue reading ›Court-Martial Trial Practice
Here is an interesting post from one of my favorite sites – federalevidence.com Testimony by arresting officer from defendant’s suppression hearing (regarding what the officer saw as the only witness to the defendant’s confession to the charged crime) should not have been admitted as FRE 804(b)(1) former testimony in defendant’s subsequent drug distribution conspiracy trial;…
Continue reading ›h/t to Prof. Berman TG. The title of this post is the headline of this new New York Times segment of its series “Room for Debate.” The NY Timesbrought together five leading lights to comment on this question (all of whom appear to supply variations on the answer “Yes”). Here is how the segment sets…
Continue reading ›Well, I use Wikipedia for research. But, I use it “in some limited situations . . . for getting a sense of a term’s common usage.” Fire Insurance Exchange v. Oltman & Blackner, Case No. 201004262-CA, 2012 UT App 230 (Utah App. 2012)(discussing the uses and reliability of Wikipedia as a source of information). See…
Continue reading ›http://verdict.justia.com/2012/08/17/teaching-and-learning-about-united-states-v-alvarez-the-stolen-valor-act-casehttp://verdict.justia.com/2012/08/17/teaching-and-learning-about-united-states-v-alvarez-the-stolen-valor-act-case
Continue reading ›Deciding what to advise an accused about deportation or sex offender registration is easy (isn’t it). But, Aguilar-Turcios v. Holder, might lead to a different conclusion. Justia.com Opinion Summary: Petitioner, a native and citizen of Honduras and a lawful permanent resident alien of the United States, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’…
Continue reading ›1. None of the Supreme Court Justices Has Battle Experience, Andrew Cohen, The Atlantic. This is the first of a two-part series on the Supreme Court and the military. Today’s article focuses on the military history of the men who later became justices. Part II will focus on the disconnect between the current Court and…
Continue reading ›Here is a link to Orin Kerr’s review of Fourth Amendment cases from the 2011 SCOTUS term.
Continue reading ›Justice Scalia’s new book, “Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts,” is available. Here’s the puff piece from Amazon. In this groundbreaking book by best-selling authors Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner, all the most important principles of constitutional, statutory, and contractual interpretation are systematically explained in an engaging and informative style-including several hundred…
Continue reading ›So, let’s say that a witness answers a question during the Article 32, UCMJ, investigation, and then refuses to answer the same question at a subsequent trial? Does his answer at the Article 32, UCMJ investigation constitute a prior inconsistent statement under Rule 801(d)(1)(A)? Well, an Article 32, UCMJ, investigation is certainly an “other proceeding”…
Continue reading ›




