Court-Martial Trial Practice

Best evidence of data
Philip D. Cave

The government wants to offer data from a computer or some other mechanical or recording device. Can a NCIS agent testify about the contents. No. That violates the best evidence rule, Mil. R. Evid. 1001. Courtesy of federalevidence.com here is a link for a recent case dealing with GPS information: Ninth Circuit reverses an importation…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

Not sure the value – but I’m tracking the impending release of this publication: Apparently written for civilian attorney’s representing current or former military personnel, it may well have resources, ideas, and guidance for the military practitioner. Major Evan Seamore, Chief of Military Justice for the U.S. Army Maneuver Center of Excellence, Fort Benning, GA,…

Continue reading ›
Is it reliable
Philip D. Cave

Quite a few cases, especially the sexual assault ones arriving recently have involved text and chat messages as potential evidence against the client. As is to be expected, most of the time the investigators do not seize and clone the phone to preserve evidence (although I am dealing with one CID office at Fort Lee…

Continue reading ›
Is it warranted?
Philip D. Cave

Warrant for DNA failed to show probable cause because it was based on mere conclusions. On remand, however, the state is free to use inevitable discovery to validate it. State v. Jenkins, 2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 84 (March 28, 2012): Nevertheless, the State argues that because this case involves a sex crime, the magistrate could…

Continue reading ›
CSI is an effect only?
Philip D. Cave

Jessica D. Gabel & Ashley D. Champion, Regulating the Science of Forensic Evidence: A Broken System Requires a New Federal Agency, 19 Texas L. Rev. See Also 19 (2011). Science has its watershed moments. In February 2009, the National Academy of Sciences released its much-anticipated diagnosis of and prescription for the problems plaguing the practice…

Continue reading ›
Convening authority actions
Philip D. Cave

On 22 March 2012, CAAF made summary disposition of United States v. Sobenes. No. 11-0566/MC. U.S. v. Alan D. SOBENES. CCA 201000381. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the convening authority approved the sentence, which included…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes
Philip D. Cave

In addition to oral argument in Vazquez (link to argument here), the court issued several opinions of relevance to military trial and appellate practitioners: what are the “rules” and standards for IAC in regard to pretrial negotiations. Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye. the Court vacated the decision of the Court of Appeals of…

Continue reading ›
Collateral effects
Philip D. Cave

On 20 March 2012, NMCCA decided United States v. Jones; and in doing so they have answered a question that was not unexpected, but took a little while to come. In United States v. Miller, 63 M.J. 452 (C.A.A.F. 2006), CAAF decided prospectively that defense counsel must advise a client about the DoD sexual offender…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message