Court-Martial Trial Practice

In the NMCCA (Walker DP)
Philip D. Cave

The NMCCA has issued a published opinion in United States v. Walker. This case began its appellate life with a death penalty sentence. In 2008, this court issued an opinion, United States v. Walker, 66 M.J. 721 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. 2008), in which we affirmed one of the findings of guilty to violating Article 118, UCMJ, except…

Continue reading ›
In the NMCCA (Stratton)
Philip D. Cave

NMCCA dismisses a conviction for consensual homosexual sodomy in United States v. Stratton. It’s unpublished but worth the read. Appellant was accused of forcible sodomy, but was convicted of consensual sodomy. That means Lawrence and Marcum had to be discussed. Read this case for the following: A discussion and reiteration of a “private” location is…

Continue reading ›
Crawford-Autopsy reports-and a split
Philip D. Cave

There appears to be a split shaping up between the circuits over the use of a surrogate to introduce autopsy reports. Thanks to federalevidence.com here are the basics. [Are] autopsy reports are admissible under the Confrontation Clause. The First Circuit has held that autopsy reports may be admitted without the testimony of the report author…

Continue reading ›
U.S. v. Manning
Philip D. Cave

Oooops, I meant H.M. the Queen v. Delisle. The Winnipeg Free Press reports on a cross-border military justice case. It begins, Putting an accused navy spy on trial represents a potential legal and intelligence nightmare for the . . . government, one where it will have to resist the temptation to dispense justice in secret,…

Continue reading ›
CLE
Philip D. Cave

Registration for the Virginia CLE 42nd Criminal Law Seminar, is now online. You can attend live on 3 or 10 February. Note, VA will begin requiring a number of hours be live. They are cutting back on getting the full 12 online. The USCAAF Judicial Conference is scheduled for 7 – 8 March 2012. Hopefully…

Continue reading ›
Blazier “trailer”
Philip D. Cave

The NMCCA continues to pump out the Fosler cases with affirmances. But today there’s an interesting opinion in a urinalysis case. United States v. Alicea It’s unpublished. It’s about the use of documents and testimony from an expert about a urine sample tested by the Navy drug lab. NMCCA found the military judge abused his…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

Sherry F. Colb is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell University. Colb teaches courses in constitutional criminal procedure, evidence, and animal rights. She has this interesting post, “Why Can’t Jurors Distinguish “Knowing” From “Reckless” Misconduct?” Recently, The National Law Journal carried a story about an important gap that has emerged in…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope!
Philip D. Cave

Fayobserver reports that as of 09012012: Nearly 11 weeks after a panel of judges heard arguments in Timothy Hennis’ appeal, a decision still has not been made. El Paso Times reports: A Beaumont laboratory technician was confronted on Tuesday by a teenage family member who said he had sexually abused her since she was 5…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes-10012012
Philip D. Cave

(Sans TinyURL) Smith v. Cain is of importance to military practitioners because of the always issue of access to “CID” notes and case files. This is a case about discovery. Apparently the investigators’ notes contained conflicting information to that testified to by the star prosecution witness. The Supremes issued an opinion in Smith v. Cain…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope! 08012012
Philip D. Cave

Week Ahead. LA Times reports that a panel of two officers and four enlisted have been selected for United States v. Wuterich. Merits to begin Monday. Week Behind. Ledger-Enquirer reports: One of five soldiers accused in the downtown beating of a former soldier was acquitted Wednesday during a court martial at Fort Benning. United States…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message