Court-Martial Trial Practice

A quickie on UMC
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Martin, ACCA April 2020. On appeal, Appellant argued that six separate convictions of Art. 107 were UMC under the circumstances, but Appellant’s UMC claim never gets off the ground. Appellant contends that because the “criminality behind” his Article 107 convictions was not the statements themselves, but rather the fact that appellant made…

Continue reading ›
Digital evidence suppressed
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Taylor, NMCCA 30 April 2020 is a government appeal of a judge’s ruling to suppress evidence. [T]he military judge granted a Defense motion to suppress evidence resulting from the searches of 12 of Appellee’s electronic devices. We are asked to decide whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal and, if so, whether…

Continue reading ›
Who needs PC
Philip D. Cave

GA: Arrest for sex offense wasn’t PC to believe digital storage device on person had evidence; SW suppressed Posted on April 30, 2020 by Hall Defendant was arrested for aggravated child molestation and aggravated sodomy, and he had a digital storage device on him. Police sought a search warrant for the storage device, but the…

Continue reading ›
Army RFGOS change
Philip D. Cave

In United States v. Vance, ACCA 2018, the addressed RFGOS after changes to UCMJ but without any AR changes. It’s a little complicated so read the opinion. Today we consider what happens when, in violation of Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the convening authority sets aside the findings and sentence in a…

Continue reading ›
Collateral effects of a court-martial
Philip D. Cave

Stewart v. SecNav. One of perhaps many to come in which Jim McPherson is sued in his OFFICIAL capacity. In this case, Marine Corps Officer Nicholas Stewart challenges the Navy Secretary’s refusal to grant him a waiver of statutory requirements that govern his eligibility for incentive pay as “arbitrary, capricious, . . . or otherwise…

Continue reading ›
Some guidance on MJA 2016
Philip D. Cave

Navy Military Justice Act 2016 Training guides Prof. Dave Schlueter has Reforming Military Justice: An Analysis of the Military Justice Act 2016. As always, TJAGSA has an excellent Deskbook which addresses aspects of the MJA-2016, The Act is here. Some other resources are available at NIMJ. The Military Justice Review Group summary with some interesting…

Continue reading ›
Rube Goldberg
Philip D. Cave

Fewer and fewer people these days remember the work of Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Rube Goldberg, who died in 1970. For those who do, the name brings a smile. A “Rube Goldberg” contraption is a piece of machinery with many moving parts of various types, maniacally designed to accomplish some simple goal. Thanks to Congress, the…

Continue reading ›
Changing DNA
Philip D. Cave

Is DNA Evidence Relevant? UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 20-03 4 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2020 Kenneth W. Graham University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) – School of Law Date Written: February 10, 2020 Abstract In admitting DNA sample taken at the crime scene in 2010 to compare it with a…

Continue reading ›
Compelled decryption
Philip D. Cave

Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr 134 Harvard Law Review (Forthcoming) 58 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2020 Orin S. Kerr University of California, Berkeley School of Law Date Written: February 6, 2020 Abstract The Supreme Court is likely to rule soon on how the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to compelled decryption of a…

Continue reading ›
Evidence biases
Philip D. Cave

The Evidence Rules that Convict the Innocent Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming 51 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2020 Jeffrey Bellin William & Mary Law School Date Written: March 2, 2020 Abstract Over the past decades, DNA testing has uncovered hundreds of examples of the most important type of trial errors: innocent defendants convicted of serious crimes…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message