Court-Martial Trial Practice

Waiver or forfeiture
Philip D. Cave

In United States v. Gladue, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009), has underscored the importance of understanding the terms of a PTA and the effect on appellate was well as trial issues. In Gladue the accused, as is common, agreed to waive any waivable motions. The MJ discussed with appellant a number of motions covered by…

Continue reading ›
Chessani
Philip D. Cave

The LA Times on line is reporting that the NMCCA, sitting en banc, has: The Marine Corps appealed the panel’s ruling to the full nine-member court. But the court Tuesday night rejected the appeal without command. The Marine Corps can continue its appeals or attempt to reinstate charges against Chessani by launching a new investigation…

Continue reading ›
Stolen honor
Philip D. Cave

Here is an interesting piece by Pamla M. Sterner, The Stolen Valor Act 2005. 120 STAT. 3266 PUBLIC LAW 109–437—DEC. 20, 2006. Vietnam Veteran Charged With Violation of the Stolen Valor Act of 2005. Signed into law in 2006. These type of cases are certainly the most difficult of all within the military.

Continue reading ›
Authoritative citation to authority
Philip D. Cave

The Kansas Court of Appeals continues the tradition of citation to anecdotal legal authority. See The cult of Sir Cloudesly Shovell, CAAFLog, 21 April 2009. It appears that the Kansas Court of Appeals cited the little watched short running show “Branded” as a basis to overturn a trial judges requirement that a convicted child abuser…

Continue reading ›
Hypnotically refreshed testimony
Philip D. Cave

We are all familiar with Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 (1987), in which a per se bar against hypnotically refreshed testimony of an accused was held unconstitutional. Prof. Colin Miller reports that the state of Illnois finds that a per se bar can be applied to witnesses other than the accused. I Put A…

Continue reading ›
What is a seizure of the person
Philip D. Cave

Here is an article brought to our attention by FourthAmendment.com. A thoughtful article about the Supreme Court’s “seizure” doctrine, so much a part of the all encompassing reasonable suspicion standard, by David K. Kessler is Free to Leave? An Empirical Look at the Fourth Amendment’s Seizure Standard, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 51 (2009).…

Continue reading ›
Reading
Philip D. Cave

There are two items in this month’s Journal of Law and Human Behavior with value and relevance to trial practice: an item on interviewing, and an item on how juries make decisions. Here are the titles, more later. Divine, Buddenheim, Houp, Studebaker, and Stolle, Strength of Evidence, Evidentiary Influences, and the Liberation Hypothesis, Data from…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message