Court-Martial Trial Practice

Military Rules of Evidence.
Philip D. Cave

Rule 1102. Amendments. Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to the Military Rules of Evidence 18 months after the effective date of such amendments, unless action to the contrary is taken by the President. On September 19, 2008, Fed. R. Evid. 502, a new evidence rule concerning the attorney-client privilege and work-product…

Continue reading ›
On the reliability of “expert” testimony — the ears (don’t) have it.
Philip D. Cave

It app-ears that ear print comparisons have been advocated as a method of identifying a perpetrator. But, it app-ears that the British courts are giving the so-called expert an earful of doubt. Andre A. Moenssens, Another Ear Print Conviction Reversed! (Prof. Moenssens is one of several law professors to follow on issues of forensics and…

Continue reading ›
Private looking or search subject to the Fourth Amendment?
Philip D. Cave

In considering whether conduct of a private citizen is subject to the Fourth Amendment, our court considers “whether the government had knowledge of and acquiesced in the intrusive conduct; whether the citizen intended to assist law enforcement agents or instead acted to further his own purposes; and whether the citizen acted at the government’s request.”…

Continue reading ›
Do military (DoD) lawyers know the meaning of “Brady material?”
Philip D. Cave

Personally, from experience, I’m not sure they do. However, Judge Emmett Sullivan, of the D.C. for D.C. doesn’t think so. Here is an item on The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes, Judge Threatens Justice Lawyers With Contempt Over Detainee Documents, 13 March 2009. So-called Brady rules require prosecutors to hand over information to defense attorneys…

Continue reading ›
CAAF grant.
Philip D. Cave

Here is an interesting CAAF grant in a Coast Guard case. No. 08-0719/CG. U.S. v. Webster M. SMITH. CCA 1275. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE VIOLATED APPELLANT’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS BY LIMITING HIS CROSS-EXAMINATION OF [SR], THE GOVERNMENT’S ONLY WITNESS, ON THREE OF THE FIVE CHARGES. Appellant…

Continue reading ›
Discipline is the cure.
Philip D. Cave

Kevin Maurer, Wounded soldier’s care probed, FayObserver.com, 11 March 2009. If this report is believed, injured and wounded soldiers in medical holding company’s are disciplined at a higher rate than line company’s. Apparently, it is not an excuse for a failure to go that your prescribed medication for you injury or illness causes you to…

Continue reading ›
New CAAF cases.
Philip D. Cave

Two new CAAF cases have been put up on the website. United States v. Stephens, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. Mar. 12, 2009). The prosecution called the victims father to talk about the effect the trial had on her. Appellant, citing United States v. Mobley, 31 M.J. 273 (C.M.A. 1990), United States v. Carr, 25 M.J.…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message