You have heard me speak of secondary gain; a term used by psychologists which we lawyers call motive to lie. There are several motives to lie, United States v. Wetuski, AFCCA, presents two–to get out of trouble and to get an expedited transfer. Given the timing of A1C ME’s removal from military justice and the…
Continue reading ›Court-Martial Trial Practice
From time to time I bring attention to a civilian case that may be of interest to practitioners. Mostly these are post-CAAF cases arising from the USDB. So today I have Coleman v. Commandant., decided 22 November 2019, in the USDC Kansas. This matter is a pro se petition for habeas corpus filed under 28…
Continue reading ›No. 19-0467/AR. U.S. v. Charles E. Robinson III. CCA 20170536. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the sentence affirmed by the lower court appears not to conform to the terms of the pretrial agreement. In accordance with…
Continue reading ›Eve Brensike Primus, Disaggregating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Doctrine: Four Forms of Constitutional Ineffectiveness. 72 STANDFORD L. REV. x (2020). For years, experts have blamed Strickland v. Washington’s lax standard for assessing trial attorney effectiveness for many of the criminal justice system’s problems. But the conventional understanding of Strickland as a problem for ineffectiveness claims…
Continue reading ›Anyone raising a UCI motion must be familiar with the Third Army cases and those that follow. United States v. Thomas, 22 MJ 388 (C.M.A. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085 (1987); see also United States v. Levite, 25 MJ 334 (C.M.A. 1987). Checkout United States v. Newbold, 45 M.J. 109 (C.A.A.F. 1996). Apparently NCIS…
Continue reading ›Military music will now be played before the U.S. Supreme Court. Grants in Briggs and Collins.
Continue reading ›A British article worth reading because it has application here. Akorede Omotayo, The Right to Silence – or the presumption of Guilt The right to silence is thought by many Judges and academics to be a constitutional right; which preserves Viscount Sankey’s presumption of innocence in Woolmington . For this reason, the legislative changes to…
Continue reading ›United States v. Scott., ordering a Dubay hearing. I could not find a subsequent opinion on the ACCA website, which could mean the Dubay hearing produced nothing noteworthy and the court proceeded to affirm the findings and sentence. CAAF has granted the following issue: No. 19-0365/AR. U.S. v. Jason A. Scott. CCA 20170242. On consideration…
Continue reading ›We have had a number of military cases of the years involving searches of lawyer “files” or other materials. Here is an interesting opinion from the Fourth Circuit about “taint teams.” The Fourth is not generally known as a defense friendly court. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion 31 October 2019 In re: Search Warrant…
Continue reading ›I’ve had several cases of serious and fatal car wrecks. In the process the investigators have “searched” the car’s onboard computer. There’s is quite a bit of information than can be retrieved to evaluate such things as speed, acceleration, and braking, that can aid in a prosecution. So, here is a new decision in JDSupra,…
Continue reading ›




