Court-Martial Trial Practice

Harmless error on appeal
Philip D. Cave

Daniel Epps, Harmless Errors and Substantial Rights. 131 HARV. L. REV. 2117 (2018). The harmless constitutional error doctrine is as baffling as it is ubiquitous. Although appellate courts rely on it to deny relief for claimed constitutional violations every day, virtually every aspect of the doctrine is subject to fundamental disagreement and confusion. Judges and…

Continue reading ›
The rule of lenity
Philip D. Cave

The rule of lenity is something you should have in the toolbox regardless of being a trial or appellate counsel. Intisar A. Rabb, The Appellate Rule of Lenity: Responding to Abbe R. Gluck & Richard A. Posner, Statutory Interpretation on the Bench: A Survey of Forty-Two Judges on the Federal Courts of Appeals. 131 HARV.…

Continue reading ›
The presumption of regularity
Philip D. Cave

Those of us who engage with discharge reviews, correction boards, and federal court on behalf of service-members are used to reading about the presumption of regularity–it’s a regular defense by the gubmint to an applicants claim. “I was improperly discharged.” A: “We can’t find any record of your discharge. Because of that we consider you…

Continue reading ›
Continuing problems of MRE 413 and 414
Philip D. Cave

You’ll remember Hills, Hukill, and Guardado. Basically, there are problems when the prosecution tries to invoke MRE 413 or 414 when all of the alleged events are charged. The result has been many cases being dismissed and sent for retrial or alternative actions. But, as reflected below, not all cases have a positive result for…

Continue reading ›
UCI, the carcinoma
Philip D. Cave

The author of this article clearly doesn’t understand. THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO THE PENTAGON’S WAR ON SEXUAL ASSAULT: THE MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM: A legal principle intended to protect service members after World War II has spawned a dangerous precedent.

Continue reading ›
Fourth Amendment exception NOT extended
Philip D. Cave

Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog reports on a new decision relevant to military practitioners. Opinion analysis: Justices decline to extend Fourth Amendment’s “automobile exception” When two Virginia police officers searched for the motorcyclist who had eluded them by driving away at speeds of up to 140 miles per hour, they probably would not have imagined that the…

Continue reading ›
Customary law and punishment
Philip D. Cave

The Supreme Court, however, “has long recognized that the military is, by necessity, a specialized society separate from civilian society” and “that the military has, again by necessity, developed laws and traditions of its own during its long history.” See Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 743, 94 S. Ct. 2547, 2555, 41 L. Ed.…

Continue reading ›
Post trial errors
Philip D. Cave

Though not raised by Appellant, an error in the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR) compels us to remand the case for new post-trial processing. United States v. Spelts, Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (May 2018). Now for this. The Government would be well-advised to find no solace in our resolution of this obvious error.…

Continue reading ›
Double jeopardy jeopardy
Philip D. Cave

Friend DP notes a pending Supreme Court petition in Gamble v. United States. It looks like the case was supposed to have been presented at Thursdays conference. Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause. If the court grants the petition and if the court rules in…

Continue reading ›
This is not new, it’s news, but not new
Philip D. Cave

Meet service members entrusted with guarding nuclear missiles that are among the most powerful in America’s arsenal. Air Force records obtained by The Associated Press show they bought, distributed and used the hallucinogen LSD and other mind-altering illegal drugs as part of a ring that operated undetected for months on a highly secure military base…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message