Court-Martial Trial Practice

Words of wisdom
Philip D. Cave

There is an interesting issue in the UK about an outspoken general officer commenting on political matters. As you read the article below you’ll see that the UK is no different than the US in response to outspoken flag and general officers. Philip Hammond ‘tried to court-martial senior general’, new book claims General Sir Richard…

Continue reading ›
UCI is back in focus
Philip D. Cave

The CAAF took the following action last Friday. No. 16-0309/AR. U.S. v. Michael B. O’Connor. CCA 20130853. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of the conflicting affidavits between Appellant and his trial defense counsel, we conclude that…

Continue reading ›
Members problems
Philip D. Cave

The members selection process is often at issue in a court-martial. One of the common concerns is the selection based purely on rank–usually the very senior. So, CAAF is about to enter the discussion again based on a grant yesterday. No. 16-0391/MC. U.S. v. Emmanuel Q. Bartee. CCA 201500037. On consideration of the petition for…

Continue reading ›
Troubling, very troubling
Philip D. Cave

The CAAF has decided United States v. Rogers, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2016) today. The issue under consideration was a challenge to a member–the senior member–for implied bias that was (as CAAF now says, wrongly) denied by the military judge. The issue and decisions are not so troubling; the whole question of challenges to members…

Continue reading ›
New issues
Philip D. Cave

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has been active recently in a number of grants of review. What is noteworthy has been the grant of three cases in which it was the client who raised an issue through a United States v. Grostefon pleading. This confirms my own thought that Grostefon issues ought…

Continue reading ›
Best practices
Philip D. Cave

Friend and colleague Cully Stimson has a piece on military justice practitioner professionalism, similar to some others he has put out recently. He is right on. Of course this is nothing new. I came on active duty as a navy judge advocate in January 1908. The topics Cully talks were a topic then and have…

Continue reading ›
A decision from the 10th that might be applicable to military parolees
Philip D. Cave

There are two ways a military prisoner gets out: serve to their minimum release date or get parole. Either way, the person is going to be placed into a strict form of post-release conditions. For those who get to their MRD they will go into the Mandatory Supervised Release Program. MSR (Mandatory Supervised Release) is…

Continue reading ›
Pay issue on rehearing
Philip D. Cave

You are confined, your case is appealed, your case is reversed and a new trial ordered. You will stay in confinement–pretrial confinement. But what about all the pay you lost while confined. This happened to Garcia, and after retrial he’d served two years of what became a two month sentence. We raised the issue of…

Continue reading ›
Change in the offing-again
Philip D. Cave

Practitioners of military justice have been dealing with change over the last years due primarily to different approaches to sexual assault cases. Friend and colleague Cully Stimson has a published piece from his and his organization’s perspective. Take a look. The 2015 Report of the Military Justice Review Group: Reasonable Next Steps in the Ongoing…

Continue reading ›
All too common, and potentially applicable to military investigators
Philip D. Cave

The Guardian reports, Detective criticised for ‘getting too close’ in alleged rape case, 9 May 2016. A senior judge has criticised a police detective and the Crown Prosecution Service for their handling of an accusation of gang rape after the case against four young men collapsed just as their trial was due to begin. Judge…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message