Court-Martial Trial Practice

Navy self reporting–Redux
Philip D. Cave

By regulation (the U.S. Navy Regulations and the Navy’s Standard Organization and Regulations Manual (SORM), OPNAVINST 3120.32x,), the Navy required personnel to report having been arrested or prosecutions for criminal acts by civilian authorities. In United States v. Serianne, 68 M.J.580 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. 2009), aff’d, 69 M.J. 8 (C.A.A.F. 2010). the courts found the order unlawful,…

Continue reading ›
Prosecutorial discretion
Philip D. Cave

Prof. Colin Miller has an interesting post about prosecutorial discretion during the course of trial. Besides getting a conviction and an appropriate sentence, a secondary gain of the prosecutor is to have the case affirmed on appeal. Affirmance means a guilty person doesn’t walk or get a new trial. In the post Prof. Miller refers…

Continue reading ›
To be expected
Philip D. Cave

Senator Gillibrand is not happy. Here is one of her unsubstantiated complaints. I am quite sure that some of those committing sex offenses have done so before, and with predatory behavior. But casting the vast majority of he said/she said cases as predatory men assaulting angelic waifs who can’t care for themselves is sexist and…

Continue reading ›
Human Lie Detector’s-Not!
Philip D. Cave

Human lie detector’s not admissible, still, a strong circuit trend. This is consistent with military appellate case law. With expert testimony admitted on a wide range of issues under FRE 702, what limits are there to expert testimony on the credibility of the defendant? As noted by the Tenth Circuit, a consensus in disallowing this…

Continue reading ›
Interesting AF stats on military justice
Philip D. Cave

With the ongoing politics surrounding sexual assault in the military, and whether the commander should remain as the disciplinary decision maker, the AF has done an interesting review of (convictions). After a spate of sex-related incidents last year, the Air Force reviewed all courts-martial from the previous three years — more than 2,400 cases —…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

Last Words: A Survey and Analysis of Federal Judges’ Views on Allocution in Sentencing Mark W. Bennett U.S. District Court (Northern District of Iowa) Ira P. Robbins American University – Washington College of Law March 10, 2014 Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2014 American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2014-9 Abstract: Allocution —…

Continue reading ›
Statute of limitations
Philip D. Cave

Congress continues to tinker, rather than take a complete overview and make rational change to the UCMJ – the politics continue. Meanwhile, we have to deal with the gruel they dish out. So, keep an eye on any changes to the statute of limitations for various sex related offenses. AND, keep an eye on any…

Continue reading ›
Improvements in eyewitness identification
Philip D. Cave

What the witness sees and remembers is a function of many factors specific to that witness and the crime scene: the witnesses ability to see without glasses, the absence of any lighting at night. What complicates matters is the deliberate or unintentional police actions (and actions of others – see ‘memory conformity’ issues). The American…

Continue reading ›
Why wrongful convictions
Philip D. Cave

There appear to be ten fairly consistent reasons for a wrongful conviction, according to a NIJ researcher. In his series of pods Dr. Gould discusses the reasons (transcripts are available at the pod). I often, always, talk about confirmation bias in connection with military sexual assault investigations, through the 32, and through the referral process,…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message