Sex Offender Registration (more)

Philip D. Cave

Professor Yung reports that: The Fourth Circuit Got it Right. (The U.S. Fourth Circuit is considered one of the more conservative of the Circuit Court’s of Appeal.) There has been some litigation over the Adam Walsh Act and whether or not all or parts of it are constitutional. Predictably most lower courts have said that the AWA is constitutional (although most of the challenges have been to the retroactivity provisions). Reading Professor Yung leads to some stream-of-consciousness thoughts about courts-martials and sex offender registration.

– We are “required” to advise clients about sex offender registration. It’s proper practice, and it will be an issue at trial in cases where your client is pleading guilty to an offense where registration may be required. A client pleading not guilty should at least know that a risk of pleading not guilty is a conviction of an offense requiring registration as a consequence.
-Anecdotelly registration requirements are leading to more contested cases?
-Also anecdotelly, some convening authorities are apparently willing to negotiate the charge, not necessarily the confinement. It would not be unexpected to see a plea to a violation of Article 128, as opposed to indecent assault or indecent acts, but without a sentence cap. Some clients have, and I suspect might continue to be willing to offer and take such a pretrial agreement.
-When advising military clients of sex offender registration it is difficult to know precisely what to tell them. -Regardless of what DoD or the appellate courts think, the rules are arcane and complex. I’ve seen at least one “pro-forma” advice to clients which is wrong is several respects. (I suspect civilian attorneys have more contact with clients and former clients post-service on this issue than military attorneys.)
-I would be interested in knowing what clients are told, how detailed, and how tailored to the clients particular situation. This will be the next “my lawyer didn’t tell me that” issue.
-I would be interested in knowing if there is any trend in the NG/G plea ratio and/or PTA policies.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message