I commented yesterday that the decision by the Homeland Security Committee could be a potential boon to defense discovery in Major Hasan’s court-martial at Fort Hood. Homeland Security committee begins collecting discovery for the Major Hasan defense team. It’s not clear yet, but it looks like the Army and Department of Defense might also be…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in fort hood
And pigs have wings and can fly. The media continues to make the comment that investigators are waiting to talk with Major Hasan, at Fort Hood, and once they do we’ll know more about his motives. Huh? We’ll find out at court-martial what each party is suggesting are the reasons and motives, but unlikely before…
Continue reading ›There’s plenty of information being put out that Major Hasan had problems, not just with his ideology, but also with his provider skills. So, people ask, why would the Army want to keep him and place him counseling returning or deploying personnel, send him to Fort Hood, and prepare to deploy him. There have been…
Continue reading ›Major Hasan’s acts at Fort Hood are quite appropriately being viewed as apt to impose a death penalty at his court-martial. Based on what we are seeing and hearing there seems to be little doubt that the prosecution can gain a conviction (although an insanity defense is not out of the question). Regardless, the events…
Continue reading ›U.S. President Barack Obama Saturday urged members of Congress not to turn the investigation into the Fort Hood massacre into “political theater.” Reports Military.com. This is a step in the right direction. Ratchet down the political rhetoric, allow the investigators to get their work done, and allow the prosecution and defense to focus on their…
Continue reading ›How far should members of congress or the President, or anyone, get involved in how to prosecute Major Hasan for his acts at Fort Hood. Certainly the victims are entitled to be involved and are required to be through the Department of Defense Victim-Witness Assistance Program. The program does not give politicians or government officials…
Continue reading ›A question arises for Major Hasan and the court-martial about venue or situs or trial at Fort Hood or somewhere else. Here is the general rule from R.C.M. 906(b)(11), for a change of venue of a court-martial: United States v. Curtis was at one time a death penalty case, but not anymore as a result…
Continue reading ›The Christian Science Monitor reports and makes this observation: But emerging evidence that Hasan may have terrorist connections could alter the prosecutorial strategy, as his story would hold invaluable information for investigators. One way to get that information would be to offer Hasan a deal – such as revoking the death penalty if he’ll fill…
Continue reading ›A number of groups are unhappy that Major Hasan has not been charged under Article 119a, UCMJ, yet for his killing of a pregnant mother and her fetus at Fort Hood. (See e.g. Pro-Life Group Asks Military to Charge Hasan) So far his court-martial charges are all the 118’s. One of the other issues that’s…
Continue reading ›So which CID agents are violating Article 92, UCMJ? And if they are lawyers on the government side, which lawyers are violating Article 92, UCMJ, and ethics rules for lawyers in the Army regarding pretrial publicity? officials told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the case…
Continue reading ›




