Articles Posted in fort hood

Army about to help the defense with discovery and preparation
Philip D. Cave

I commented yesterday that the decision by the Homeland Security Committee could be a potential boon to defense discovery in Major Hasan’s court-martial at Fort Hood. Homeland Security committee begins collecting discovery for the Major Hasan defense team. It’s not clear yet, but it looks like the Army and Department of Defense might also be…

Continue reading ›
When investigators talk with Major Hasan we’ll know more
Philip D. Cave

And pigs have wings and can fly. The media continues to make the comment that investigators are waiting to talk with Major Hasan, at Fort Hood, and once they do we’ll know more about his motives. Huh? We’ll find out at court-martial what each party is suggesting are the reasons and motives, but unlikely before…

Continue reading ›
Why did the Army want to keep Major Hasan
Philip D. Cave

There’s plenty of information being put out that Major Hasan had problems, not just with his ideology, but also with his provider skills. So, people ask, why would the Army want to keep him and place him counseling returning or deploying personnel, send him to Fort Hood, and prepare to deploy him. There have been…

Continue reading ›
Death penalty debate – more data points
Philip D. Cave

Major Hasan’s acts at Fort Hood are quite appropriately being viewed as apt to impose a death penalty at his court-martial. Based on what we are seeing and hearing there seems to be little doubt that the prosecution can gain a conviction (although an insanity defense is not out of the question). Regardless, the events…

Continue reading ›
Here’s a start . . .
Philip D. Cave

U.S. President Barack Obama Saturday urged members of Congress not to turn the investigation into the Fort Hood massacre into “political theater.” Reports Military.com. This is a step in the right direction. Ratchet down the political rhetoric, allow the investigators to get their work done, and allow the prosecution and defense to focus on their…

Continue reading ›
Is this unlawful influence, or just a bad idea, or . . . ?
Philip D. Cave

How far should members of congress or the President, or anyone, get involved in how to prosecute Major Hasan for his acts at Fort Hood. Certainly the victims are entitled to be involved and are required to be through the Department of Defense Victim-Witness Assistance Program. The program does not give politicians or government officials…

Continue reading ›
Change of court-martial venue
Philip D. Cave

A question arises for Major Hasan and the court-martial about venue or situs or trial at Fort Hood or somewhere else. Here is the general rule from R.C.M. 906(b)(11), for a change of venue of a court-martial: United States v. Curtis was at one time a death penalty case, but not anymore as a result…

Continue reading ›
Finally, a media outlet noticed a possible way out of death for Major Hasan, and avoidance of his potential for martyrdom
Philip D. Cave

The Christian Science Monitor reports and makes this observation: But emerging evidence that Hasan may have terrorist connections could alter the prosecutorial strategy, as his story would hold invaluable information for investigators. One way to get that information would be to offer Hasan a deal – such as revoking the death penalty if he’ll fill…

Continue reading ›
Mother to court-martial or Afghanistan; her child into custody
Philip D. Cave

A number of groups are unhappy that Major Hasan has not been charged under Article 119a, UCMJ, yet for his killing of a pregnant mother and her fetus at Fort Hood. (See e.g. Pro-Life Group Asks Military to Charge Hasan) So far his court-martial charges are all the 118’s. One of the other issues that’s…

Continue reading ›
So which – – –
Philip D. Cave

So which CID agents are violating Article 92, UCMJ? And if they are lawyers on the government side, which lawyers are violating Article 92, UCMJ, and ethics rules for lawyers in the Army regarding pretrial publicity? officials told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the case…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message