From the conclusions of law:
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in lakin
I posted a tease here, and it didn’t take long for Dwight “My Liege” Sullivan to crack the code. In other words, Judge Lind used the word “embarrassment” in precisely the political question doctrine context (and using almost exactly the same words) as CAAF in New and the Supremes in Baker v. Carr. And all…
Continue reading ›Some reporting of last weeks Article 39(a), UCMJ, hearing appears to attribute the military judge’s ruling to a desire to save the president embarrassment. I believe this is a gross distortion of a small part of what the military judge said. I was there and heard her read her findings and conclusions which were then…
Continue reading ›Found at birtherreport.com. LTC Lakin and Mr. Jensen will be on the Barry Farber radio tonight at 2000. Apparently the “embarrsassment” language was intended by the judge to alert Congress that they need to begin impeachment proceedings. Note, it is Article 46, UCMJ, 10 U.S. Code 846.
Continue reading ›The spinning has begun, and yes there’s a pun in there, or at least an attempted one. Based on cherry-picked comments from a number of Lakin supporters it appears that all of this is merely the military judge saving the President “embarrassment.” They are grasping at a straw as a way to explain a complete…
Continue reading ›I have just returned from watching most of the Article 39(a), UCMJ, hearing. (I left as the last item on the table was a defense request for Alan Keyes and LtGen McInerney.) To say that the military judge destroyed the defense arguments in detail would not be an overstatement. Although the military judge did politely…
Continue reading ›safeguardourconsititution (APF) has an affidavit from LTG T. McInerney in support of LTC Lakin’s discovery request. Lawyers interested in the legal merits of the issue will likely find themselves dissatisfied with the affidavit. It is a combination of justification for LTC Lakin’s contumacy and reasons why the discovery should be granted. There is no comment…
Continue reading ›Silence. 20 August 2010 was the day to submit motions. They would have had up to the close of business. Nothing on APF in terms of documents filed. Frankly I’m not expecting anything to be released, certainly not by the government. You will recollect that LTC Lakin and APF has been selective in what documents…
Continue reading ›World News Daily reports: A reported threat by a senior Army officer to “Taser” another officer on trial for challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president could be a serious “command influence” issue that could taint the case, according to an expert. Here is the Greeley Gazette article referred to: A former Captain in the…
Continue reading ›Huffington Post has a piece about MEJA. In the perpetual debate over legal accountability of, and prosecution if necessary, of private military and security contractors one often sees the arguments reduced to two simplistic arguments. PMSC opponents argue the contractors argue in a legal vacuum and with utter impunity. This is, of course, as anyone…
Continue reading ›




