Whatever happened to . . .

Philip D. Cave

PV2 Brandon G. Rushing?

The military connection: Some years ago, he plead guilty to, carnal knowledge and indecent acts with a child, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eleven months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1. United States v. Rushing, ARMY 20010582, 2003 CCA LEXIS 387 (A. Ct. Crim. App. February 12, 2003).

And now:

A jury convicted Rushing of the first degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, committed in 2006, in addition to other sex offenses. At the punishment phase, the State sought an automatic-life enhanced sentence … using Rushing’s prior court-martial convictions under the UCMJ for carnal knowledge and indecent acts with a child under sixteen.

Rushing challenged application of the Texas sentencing law on the basis that the military (federal government) is not a “state” within the meaning of the statute. Therefore he alleged a UCMJ conviction (and by application a federal one) can’t be used for sentence enhancement. In a unanimous decision,

The [Texas] court of appeals held that Rushing’s prior sex-offense convictions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) qualify as “conviction[s] under the laws of another state,” thus requiring an automatic life sentence under Texas Penal Code 12.42(c)(2)(b)(v). We agree based on our interpretation of the definition of “state” in Texas Government Code Section 311.005(7). We therefore affirm the court of appeals’s judgment.

Rushing v. State of Texas, No. PD-0773-10 (Tex. Ct. Crim. App. October 5, 2011).

Believe it or not there are some states that do not always consider a court-martial conviction as such for certain purposes: usually issues of impeachment of felony, and occasionally for sentence enhancement. Obviously Texas isn’t one of those states. There is an old article, Christopher Vaeth, Annotation: Use of Prior Military Conviction to Establish Repeat Offender Status, 11 A.L.R.5th 218. I’m sure it needs updating so don’t rely solely on it – especially in Texas, heh, heh, heh.

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message