Here is a summary of an interesting article about how the Army FAP denies a servicemember of due process, and recommending changes. We at Cave & Freeburg, have represented many servicemembers caught up in the FAP. Executive Summary The article critiques the U.S. Army’s Family Advocacy Program Incident Determination Committee (IDC), arguing that the IDC’s…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in Uncategorized
You are on trial for an offense and the prosecution wants to introduce evidence against you under Military Rule of Evidence 404(b). How does that work and what can your military defense lawyer do to exclude such evidence. The first step is to object to the evidence before trial by filing a motion in-limine. Your…
Continue reading ›I. Introduction Stalking is a serious offense under military law, reflecting the military’s commitment to protecting service members from harassment, intimidation, and threats. It is criminalized under Article 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which was introduced as part of the 2013 amendments under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal…
Continue reading ›In United States v. Gree The appellant contends that the military judge erred in admitting evidence of uncharged acts occurring seventeen months after the charged offenses to establish a common plan or scheme. He argues that this evidence was improperly admitted under Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 404(b) and that the judge did not conduct…
Continue reading ›The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, enacted in 1993 under President Bill Clinton, represented a compromise allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals to serve in the U.S. military provided they did not disclose their sexual orientation. This policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted service members but mandated discharge for those…
Continue reading ›If you are accused of domestic violence, assault, or a sexual offense, then your commander will issue a Military Protective Order (MPO) prohibiting you from contacting the alleged victim. As military defense counsel, we at Cave & Freeburg, LLP, have experience with MPOs and problems with them. Also, being given an MPO may be the…
Continue reading ›A court-martial sentenced servicemember has the right to a speedy appeal. The right is based on the Constitution and on various interpretations of military appellate courts like the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. The first and most command barrier to you or your loved one getting a speedy appeal is the failure of the local…
Continue reading ›As military defense lawyers, we at Cave & Freeburg, LLP, along with Brenner Fissell, are representing transgender-plus servicemembers navigating the Trump executive orders. A History of Transgender and Gender Dysphoria Persons in the U.S. Military The history of transgender individuals and those experiencing gender dysphoria in the U.S. military has varied in periods of exclusion,…
Continue reading ›In United States v. Deremer, 2025 CCA LEXIS 46, 2025 WL 427756 (N-M.Ct. Crim. App. 20 Feb. 2025), NMCCA decided that when an alleged victim has an SVC, the MCIO must notify the SVC of any interviews, especially those with intent to interrogate the “victim” about a false allegation. The McOmber rule was based on…
Continue reading ›A convicted servicemember has the statutory and constitutional right to speedy review of their court-martial conviction. Unfortunately, the appellate cases show consistent problems in getting a record of the trial from the field to the court of criminal appeals. Here is a recent example. In United States v. Lathrop, the Army Court of Criminal Appeals…
Continue reading ›




