Articles Posted in Up Periscope

Confrontation at sentencing
Philip D. Cave

In United States v. McDonald, 55 M.J. 173 (C.A.A.F. 2001), the CAAF has held that the Sixth Amendment confrontation right does not apply at sentencing, but that the Fifth Amendment does. Here is an interesting case from the Supreme Court of Arkansas, Vankirk v. State, which applies the confrontation right to a jury (members) case.…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope!
Philip D. Cave

Marine Corps Times reports: A Marine squad leader [Hutchins] who was convicted of leading troops to kill an Iraqi civilian will get a temporary release from prison to witness the birth of his second child. TheRepulic reports on United States v. Burke. I know we often take issue with the quality of military law enforcement…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes-161011
Philip D. Cave

Here is a link to pending non-military criminal law cases at the Supremes, which may have an impact in military cases. Next set of potentially relevant oral arguments begin 31 October. Here are links to subsequent ‘actions,’ in some of the cases. Transcript of Maples v. Thomas, oral argument. Whether a defendant is prohibited from…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read . . .
Philip D. Cave

Davis & Leo on Determinations of Voluntariness for Admissibility of Confessions Deborah Davis (University of Nevada, Reno) and Richard A. Leo (University of San Francisco – School of Law, pictured) have posted ‘Interrogation-Related Regulatory Decline:’ Ego-Depletion, Failures of Self-Regulation and the Decision to Confess (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2011-24) on SSRN.…

Continue reading ›
Motions practice
Philip D. Cave

Contrary to what appears to be a common belief among attorneys in criminal cases, the court does not live in the discovery file for each case. Indeed, prior to trial, the court has little or no access to the evidence in the case apart from what the parties may present in support of or resistance…

Continue reading ›
Answer me this batman
Philip D. Cave

When are statements made by a prosecutor admissible at trial. And assuming you can establish relevance and get past Mil. R. Evid. 403, under what rule. How about Mil. R. Evid. 801 as admissions of a party-opponent. You think I jest. Check out United States v. Bakshinian, 65 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (DC S.D. Ca.…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope!
Philip D. Cave

North County Times reports: All defense appeals in the case of a Camp Pendleton Marine accused of manslaughter in the deaths of nine Iraqis have been exhausted and his trial date has been set. Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich is scheduled to go on trial at the base on Jan. 4. The Judge’s Bench, from Grand…

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

Thanks to Mary Hall for pointing to Litigation Insights. I have linked to their “newsletters.” I have frequently commented on a number of issue relevant to members and how they should be treated, perceived, and educated, and how they may be influenced by non-verbal cues. As some know I have some rules of engagement for…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope!
Philip D. Cave

The Cape-Coral Daily Breeze reports: Pvt. 1st Class Andrew H. Holmes of Boise, Idaho, pleaded guilty to murder and wrongfully using a controlled substance on Sept. 22 in a plea agreement with prosecutors, according to Maj. Chris Ophardt at the Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington. The following day, the judge sentenced Holmes to 15 years…

Continue reading ›
Whatever happened to . . .
Philip D. Cave

PV2 Brandon G. Rushing? The military connection: Some years ago, he plead guilty to, carnal knowledge and indecent acts with a child, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eleven months, forfeiture…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message