Articles Posted in Up Periscope

Is it harder?
Philip D. Cave

Here’s a question. Is it harder for a commander to engage in UCI before of the information age – for example the availability of smartphones, small recorders, and social media. Apparently for some that may a yes. Former Top Officers Say Internet Age Limits Meddling in Sexual Assault Cases.

Continue reading ›
Worth the read
Philip D. Cave

Taking Mistakes Seriously, Paul J. Larkin Jr. The Heritage Foundation January 13, 2014 28 B.Y.U. J. of Pub. L. (2014) (Forthcoming) Abstract: There are two very different mistake doctrines in the law. The common law doctrine that ignorance of the law is no excuse gives no weight to reasonable, good faith mistakes insofar as criminal…

Continue reading ›
Impeachment with prior inconsistent
Philip D. Cave

One of my favorite bloggers, Professor Colin Miller has this: Arizona Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) provides that A statement is not hearsay if…[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing…and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is…inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony So, let’s say that an alleged victim gives a detailed…

Continue reading ›
who is the victim
Philip D. Cave

No. 14-0134/AR. U.S. v. Brett M. GASKILL. CCA 20110028. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of United States v. Lubasky, 68 M.J. 260 (C.A.A.F. 2010), we note that the proper victim in Specifications 2, 3, and 4…

Continue reading ›
Beware trial defense counsel
Philip D. Cave

The CAAF has decided United States v. Moss. The decision involves jurisdiction to appeal to CAAF for a Soldier who was AWOL at trial, apparently AWOL at the time the case was heard at ACCA, and AWOL at the time her appellate defense counsel petitioned CAAF. Read the case. It may be wise for trial…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes
Philip D. Cave

SCOTUSBlog notes the following criminal law related petitions at the Court which may – or may not – be granted tomorrow. Warger v. Shauers 13-517 Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based on juror dishonest during voir dire to introduce juror testimony about statements made during…

Continue reading ›
Good character is admissible
Philip D. Cave

Despite Congress’s meddling with certain rules of evidence as a way to ensure convictions in sexual assault cases, we should consider that in almost every sexual assault case good character evidence will in fact be admissible and have a role. We are constrained to sustain the assignments which complain of the exclusion of testimony offered…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message