Articles Posted in Up Periscope

National Prosecution Standards
Philip D. Cave

1. The Prosecutor’s Responsibilities 1-1.1 Primary Responsibility The prosecutor is an independent administrator of justice. The primary responsibility of a prosecutor is to seek justice, which can only be achieved by the representation and presentation of the truth. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that the guilty are held accountable, that the…

Continue reading ›
You got mail*
Philip D. Cave

In my view it’s all too easy for emails to be authenticated in courts. Emails can be spammed, altered, and a lot of other things, including cut-and-paste which is all too common. Here is a note from Prof. Colin Miller about a case* in Texas that appears to take a somewhat decent approach in questioning…

Continue reading ›
More like them
Philip D. Cave

This article takes a closer look at the Duke Rape Case by analyzing the book Institutional Failures, a collection of essays that testifies to the immense damage wrought by the failure of three systems of control: the University, by failing to protect its students from a mob demanding quick justice; the media, when it reflexively…

Continue reading ›
Labs again?
Philip D. Cave

The nation’s crime labs are no strangers to scandal. Last year in Massachusetts, bogus testing by former chemist Annie Dookhan called into question tens of thousands of cases and led to the release of more than 300 people from the state’s prisons. There are currently no uniform standards or regulations for forensic labs. Congress could…

Continue reading ›
It depends
Philip D. Cave

it almost always does – if the error was harmless. federal evidence review blog brings a reminder as follows: What are the limits in which a trial court may examine witnesses under FRE 614? The Third Circuit recently assessed the boundaries of a judge’s questioning of witnesses in a case involving a defendant who represented…

Continue reading ›
State dependent
Philip D. Cave

Intriguing. Does military search and seizure depend upon and have to follow state law, even if it is a “federal” officer doing the searching and seizing? This Article argues for a model of the Fourth Amendment – the contingent Fourth Amendment – that courts and commentators have overlooked. It asserts that the only common-law rules…

Continue reading ›
A cautionary tale
Philip D. Cave

The ever sentient Prof. Colin Miller brings us a good reminder to be careful, at his evidence prof blog. Federal Rule of Evidence 410(a)(4) states as follows: (a) Prohibited Uses. In a civil or criminal case, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea…

Continue reading ›
On the confrontation front
Philip D. Cave

Article 10, UCMJ, may be dead. But there is still activity on the Sixth Amendment confrontation front. Here’s an interesting case dredged up by federal evidence review blog about a 40 year old affidavit and its treatment under the Sixth. Fifth Circuit reverses conviction after the government failed to meet its burden to show that…

Continue reading ›
Tool box update
Philip D. Cave

I was reminded the other day when working on an appellate case of a toolbox item worth the read. I often review TJAGSA teaching materials when working on a case. I used to also look at NJS materials, but for some reason they are no longer available to the general public through the various Navy…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message