Court-Martial Trial Practice

Worth the Read
Philip D. Cave

James Gow, War and War Crimes: Military, Legitimacy and Success in Armed Conflict, Coumbia Univ. Press, Dec. 2011. Necessity and proportionality inform the laws of war, but how do these principles work in modern warfare? What new pressures do the practitioners of war face, especially in light of rapid changes in strategy and policy and…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes
Philip D. Cave

Professor Friedman has posted various amicus pleadings on his blog here. He lists one not currently on the SCOTUSBlog for the case. A little more here with Supreme Court cases with potential impact on military justice. Professor Friedman does note as to his own filing: There are a couple of passages that I would amend…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope!
Philip D. Cave

Now we know – who the nominee is to be the next judge of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces — Kevin A. Ohlson. Here is a short fact sheet from DOJ. Here’s a piece from whorunsGOV at the Washington Post. Career History: Chief of Staff to Attorney General Eric Holder (January 2009-January…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

The Recordnet.com reports on the non-capital referral decision in United States v. Platero. The commanding general of Fort Stewart, Ga., did not talk directly with the families of two soldiers killed in Iraq a year ago – including the Carrillo family of Stockton – before making the decision to pull the death penalty off the…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

Stars & Stripes reports on the continuing trial of United States v. Wickware. The wife of a Spangdahlem Air Base airman charged with murder in the abuse death of his infant son testified at his court-martial Monday. Note the comment of an experienced military judge about how difficult these cases can be for the fact-finder…

Continue reading ›
In the Supremes
Philip D. Cave

SCOTUSBlog reports their “petition of the day,” which is a criminal evidence case with potential relevance to military justice practitioners – Childers v. Florida, if granted. Issue two is: 2. Should the Court resolve a conflict in the Circuits and clarify whether its Confrontation Clause precedents, Olden v. Kentucky, 488 U.S. 227 (1988), Delaware v.…

Continue reading ›
Junk science
Philip D. Cave

Giannelli on Junk Science and the Willingham Execution Paul C. Giannelli (Case Western Reserve University – School of Law) has posted The Execution of Cameron Todd Willingham: Junk Science, an Innocent Man, and the Politics of Death on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Cameron Todd Willingham was tried and executed for the arson deaths of…

Continue reading ›
Fosler trailer addition-maybe not
Philip D. Cave

There is some reason to believe that the result in United States v. Fosler may only benefit him. Fosler objected at trial. It is believed that all of the Fosler trailers are either guilty plea cases or not guilty plea cases where the accused did not object at trial. There’s a good argument – stated…

Continue reading ›
Wuterich and Haditha and . . .
Philip D. Cave

El Paso Times has a short piece on one of their native sons. When El Paso’s Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas was killed during an ambush in Haditha, Iraq, in 2005, a search for the perpetrators left 24 Iraqis dead. Investigators are still trying to find out the truth of what happened that day in the…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

The Press Enterprise reports: A military hearing over whether three Hawaii-based Marines should go to trial for alleged hazing of a squad member who later killed himself in Afghanistan concluded Friday and a commander will now make a final determination. Looks like some interesting litigation. Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents didn’t read the Marines their…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message