Court-Martial Trial Practice

Is it IAC
Philip D. Cave

I understand the conclusions of the court in New v. United States, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18157 (8th Cir. August 31, 2011). Defendant in his § 2255 failed to show that defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a hospital room. He cited no controlling case…

Continue reading ›
San Diego DA, and NCIS sued
Philip D. Cave

SignOnSanDiego reports an interesting civilian case, but sufficiently relevant for this weekend. (The judge has dismissed NCIS and AFIP as defendents.) The sample of U.S. Marine Sgt. Todd Sommer’s liver and kidney was full of arsenic, more arsenic than had ever been found in a human tissue sample before — by 1,250 percent, according to…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

KSALLink reports: A Fort Riley soldier is killed during a standoff at a motel in Abilene. . . . The Army says that Evenson was reported Absent Without Leave by military authorities Tuesday when he failed to appear for the second day of his court-martial for rape of a child. He was tried in absentia…

Continue reading ›
Up periscope
Philip D. Cave

Slightly off topic. The Richmond Times Despatch reports on the pending appellate action of the “Norfolk Four.” Seems to me this might be a coram nobis case had it been a court-martial. From FOB Tacoma, The News Tribune reports: The Army is moving forward with most of the charges it pressed against a Joint Base…

Continue reading ›
More on Crawford to Williams-with stops between
Philip D. Cave

Professor Freidman the Great Confrontationist has posted the Petitioner’s Brief and Appendix for Williams v. Illinois. This case is one of several we should be following that will come from the Supremes. This issue presented in Williams is: Whether the prosecution violates the Confrontation Clause when it presents, pursuant to a state rule of evidence,…

Continue reading ›
A Randolph case
Philip D. Cave

Police came to do a knock-and-talk, and defendant objected to a search of the bedroom he shared with his wife. When he objected, the police took the wife and her mother outside to talk about consent. The district court’s effort to find a hierarchy of privacy interests in the home has no foundation inRandolph, and…

Continue reading ›
More on Perry v. NH
Philip D. Cave

I posted about eyewitness testimony the other day. Here is an article to read. Sandra Guerra Thompson (University of Houston Law Center) has postedJudicial Gatekeeping of Police-Generated Witness Testimony on SSRN. Here is the abstract: This article urges a fundamental change in the administration of criminal justice. It calls for an active role for trial…

Continue reading ›
The year of 412
Philip D. Cave

Yes, this season appears to be the one to address a number of lingering or ambiguous (or not so ambiguous) issues about Mil. R. Evid. 412. So, it seems apt that the last opinion for this season is out: United States v. Ellenbrock. We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred in applying…

Continue reading ›
CAAF decides LNC Sweeney’s case
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Sweeney. This is a Crawford-Blazier case. In the Blazier cases, we set forth a straightforward path for analyzing the admissibility of drug testing reports under the Confrontation Clause. . . . we hold that Appellant was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him, and we remand to the court below…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message