Court-Martial Trial Practice

More on discovery
Philip D. Cave

The prosecution of Senator Stevens highlighted problems with prosecutors who don’t comply with their Brady-plus obligations. Here’s another one. New Trial Granted Because of Prosecutor Misconduct: Mike Scarcella writes at Blog of the Legal Times that a D.C. Superior Court judge has granted a new trial to a man convicted of fatally stabbing another man…

Continue reading ›
Justice delayed
Philip D. Cave

Here is an interesting bit from Crime & Consequences blog. Reprimanded for Delayed Ruling: At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman posts an excerpt from a Memphis Commercial Appeal article describing the public reprimand of a Shelby County Criminal Court judge for taking more than seven years to rule on a death penalty appeal. According…

Continue reading ›
Technology
Philip D. Cave

Haven’t noted something on technology for a while, so here is a piece by the American Constitution Society (the antithesis of the Federalist Society). Susan Freiwald, Phone Tracking Should Require a Warrant. A pending case in the 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals raises a profound question — should the government be able to track…

Continue reading ›
Trial Counsel argument on the merits
Philip D. Cave

Colin Miller, Thieves Like Them: Court Of Appeals Of Minnesota Explains The Boundaries Of Proper Prosecutorial Comment During Closing, 17 April 2009. It is well established that a prosecutor may not belittle or disparage the defendant(‘s case) during closing argument. At the same time, “[a] prosecutor has discretion to fashion a persuasive closing argument, and…

Continue reading ›
Injury in sexual assault cases.
Philip D. Cave

I noticed an article on the Navy JAG NKO site today that should be treated with some caution by defense counsel. It is entitled Practice Tip: Presenting medical evidence in a sexual assault case. I have no problem with the beginning and essential premise of the article – the absence of genital trauma in a…

Continue reading ›
FOIA
Philip D. Cave

For more than five years, the ACLU and other advocacy organizations have been seeking the release of Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memos that supplied the basis for the Bush administration’s interrogation, detention, rendition, and warrantless surveillance policies. So here they are from the ACLU blog.

Continue reading ›
New CAAF case
Philip D. Cave

CAAF has issued an opinion in United States v. Ranney, __ M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2009). Here is the lower court opinion. I find it interesting to read the lower court opinion. You see how the two courts have taken the same record and come to a different conclusion, the selectivity with which each court views…

Continue reading ›
Rules of completeness
Philip D. Cave

Mil. R. Evid. 106, is a rule of completeness and applies to both the prosecution and the defense. Rule 106. Remainder of or related writings or recorded statements When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require that party at that time to introduce any…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message