Court-Martial Trial Practice

Double jeopardy
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Brobst, 558 F. 3d 982 (9th Cir. 2009), is primarily a search and seizure case. But here is a tantalizing piece about double jeopardy in a child pornography case. In light of this court’s decisions in United States v. Davenport, 519 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2008) and United States v. Giberson, 527…

Continue reading ›
Seekers of change
Philip D. Cave

For those who descry the efforts of proponents for change in the military justice system, yesterday could be thought of as a historical reminder that change is hard to achieve. On 12 April 1633, the Roman Catholic church began it’s heresy inquisition of Galileo. CAAFLog has a rant today (one of his many and always…

Continue reading ›
What did happen to Watada?
Philip D. Cave

According to the Honolulu Star Bulletin: Question: It has been almost three years since 1st Lt. Ehren Watada refused to join his Stryker Brigade Combat Team when it deployed to Iraq from Fort Lewis, Wash. What is his status? Answer: The Army says it is still awaiting a decision from newly appointed U.S. Solicitor Elena…

Continue reading ›
Right to present a defense
Philip D. Cave

Here’s an interesting post by Prof. Miller. Colin Miller, Your Only Self Defense: Court Of Appeals Of Louisana Engaged In Incorrect Right To Present A Defense Analysis In Murder Appeal, 13 April 2009. Most states, including Louisiana, have rules of evidence that govern the admissibility of evidence in their courts. Those rules, however, are not…

Continue reading ›
A judges role at trial
Philip D. Cave

Here is an interesting piece by Prof. Colin Miller about the judge who asks questions of witnesses. Prof. Colin Miller, I Won’t Be The Judge Of That: Texas Appeal Reveals That The Lone Star State Doesn’t Allow For Judicial Interrogation, 9 April 2009. I think that most people would agree that judges should at least…

Continue reading ›
Rules of Engagement
Philip D. Cave

Clients and military defense counsel know I have Rules of Engagement (ROE), yes I call them that, for the client to follow, and which I often have for the Members to follow in contested cases. I have ROE for the Court too. 1. Be nice (not condescending) to the court-reporter. Don’t walk off with exhibits,…

Continue reading ›
Several new AFCCA opinions
Philip D. Cave

There are several new published and unpublished opinions on AFCCA’s website today; including a Lawrence v. Texas issue raised, the continuing effort of the prosecution in punishing an accused for exercising his constitutional rights to a trial, an issue of vindictive prosecution. United States v. Harvey, __ M.J. ___ (A. F. Ct. Crim. App. 2009).…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message