Court-Martial Trial Practice

MAJ Joel P. Cummings, Is Article 125, Sodomy a Dead Letter in Light of Lawrence v. Texas and the New Article 120? The Army Lawyer, January 2009.

United States v. Bell, No. 06-4413, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2901 (6th Cir. 17 February 2009). Recently published, this case is a decent primer on automobile stops with drug dog sniffs: what turns a traffic stop into a seizure, etc.

What happens if any enlisted person is reduced at court-martial, or an officer who faces a grade-determination consideration, for conduct as far back as late 2000, and later retires? 10 U. S. Code 1407 sets it out for us. (f) Exception for Enlisted Members Reduced in Grade and Officers Who Do Not Serve Satisfactorily in…

I’m blogging about the presentation given yesterday at the 39th (VA) Annual Criminal Law Seminar. The most important point I learned is that military justice practitioners, myself included, are not necessarily competent to advise a client properly on immigration consequences of a conviction. This of course doesn’t matter too much if it’s a not guilty…

Do you have clients who want to know about search warrants or authorizations, and do you want information and access? Well of course. Here’s an interesting case which raises the issue of access to search warrant materials pre-indictment under the Fourth Amendment — or in the military pre-preferral. If the premise of the case is…

As noted earlier, the Smith Amendment was changed recently. An astute reader has provided a new name for us — the commenter refers now to the “Bond Amendment.” Instead of the old Smith Amendment at 10 U.S. Code 986, the new law on security clearances for persons sentenced to confinement or certain punitive discharges is…

United States v. David, ACM S31478 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 10 February 2009), is of interest on the question(s) of when a military judge should recuse him or herself from a case. Here the military judge disclosed, in a naked urinalysis-cocaine case, close family member was a drug addict. The issue was raised as a…

If you are like me you are doing a lot of BAH fraud cases right now, especially for recalled or activated Guard and Reserve personnel. The AFCCA has issued an opinion about mistake and instructions in the fraud type case. United States v. Armstrong, ACM 37130 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 10 February 2009). In Armstrong…

Prof. Peter Tillers, How Distinctive Must a Modus Operandi Be to Serve as a “Signature“? Tillers on Evidence and Inference, 13 February 2009. Military Rule of Evidence 404(b), United States v. Huddleston, 485 U.S. 681 (1988), are at the heart of Prof. Tillers’ critique. In his view the rules requiring more than just happenstance are…

Some snippets from cases released to LEXIS. Plain view. Under the plain view doctrine, evidence may be seized without a warrant if the following three conditions are met: “(1) ‘the officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment in arriving at the place from which the evidence could be plainly viewed,’ (2) the object’s incriminating character…