Court-Martial Trial Practice

DoD Sexual Assault Policy
Philip D. Cave

The NMCCA has heard oral argument and has a case pending which challenges the constitutionality of the “new” Article 120, UCMJ. All the other Service CCA’s or MJ’s to consider this issue have found the statute constitutional. The MJ’s have taken varying approaches in the court-room though. One MJ I had ended up basically using…

Continue reading ›
Dedrick Fisher and shaken baby prosecutions
Philip D. Cave

Patrick Clayborn, Pre-court-martial hearing held for Fort Rucker soldier, 11 February 2009. So called shaken-baby cases can be difficult. The evidence of nexus between acts alleged and injury or death can be ambiguous and subject to interpretation, or in some cases overpowering. There are several cases worth reading in this area, Warner, in particular is…

Continue reading ›
Gitmo, and whata todo
Philip D. Cave

Greg Bruno, Backgrounder: Closing Guantanamo, Council on Foreign Relations, 12 February 2009. You will notice a reference to trial by court-martial under the UCMJ. Some, including legal experts with the Congressional Research Service, suggest the current UCMJ structure might run counter to constitutional protections such as the right to a speedy trial. Good question. How…

Continue reading ›
Prior False Accusation Evidence and the Confrontation Clause
Philip D. Cave

Peter Tillers, Prior False Accusation Evidence and the Confrontation Clause, 12 February 2009, draws attention to an excellent law review piece potentially relevant to a frequent number of military sexual assault cases. Jules Epstein, True Lies: The Constitutional and Evidentiary Bases for Admitting Prior False Accusation Evidence in Sexual Assault Prosecutions, 24 QUINNIPIAC L. REV.…

Continue reading ›
Search incident.
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Goode, No. 07-2269, 2009 U. S. App. LEXIS 2471, unpublished op. (3d Cir. 9 February 2009). The interesting point for this case is that the court found that telling a person to stop, ordering them to lie on the ground, and placing them in handcuffs is merely an investigative “stop.” Once additional…

Continue reading ›
Voir dire, Members problems.
Philip D. Cave

Professor Miller has an interesting post today, Lie To Me?: Supreme Court Of Maine Opinion Reveals That Jury Deliberations Can Be Used To Prove Juror Deceit During Voir Dire,11 February 2009. The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maine in Watts v. Maine, 2009 WL 249236 (D. Me. 2009),…

Continue reading ›
Credit for pretrial delay.
Philip D. Cave

United States v. Gross (Military Judge), Army Misc. 20081049 unpublished op. (A. Ct. Crim. App. 9 January 2009). [When you get to the court site, go to the “summary dispositions – by date” page.] This case is a government petitione for an extraordinary writ (not listed in the Denedo pleadings at the Supreme Court as…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Many years after retiring from the USN, I suddenly found myself in a very unwelcome legal matter with the Navy. It was a total shock and I was very concerned as to the impact this would have on me and my...

Rob

I was facing accusations that would not only ruin my career but my life. When I hired Mr. Freeburg, he gave me the hope that everything would be turn out great. He put a great team together along with my...

Air Force Anonymous

Phil Cave has helped me through NJP and restoration of my security clearance. He even came to visit me in Spain. I never thought I would work again and he certainly through with advise and guidance that we're...

Bryan

Mr. Nathan Freeburg fought and won a war for me. A war where my life was on the line. The week of trial was extremely long but he never seemed like he was tired. The prosecution were getting whittled down each...

Navy Anonymous

Mr. Cave saved my military retirement! His promise to me from day one was that he would fight as hard as he could he right the wring that had been done to me. And he did! I am so very thankful and grateful to...

Crystal

Mr. Freeburg is passionate about justice and upholding the law and dignity of the court. He is brave and bold in his ability to represent his clients amidst the attempted intimidation and procedural pressure...

Navy Represented

The Army and prosecution was pushing for me to take a Chapter 10. But Mr. Freeburg made me confident we could win. We went to trial and he crushed them in cross examination and he saved my career.

Vince

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 40 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Dedicated to Military Law
Fill out the contact form or call us at 703-298-9562 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message