In United States v. Gree The appellant contends that the military judge erred in admitting evidence of uncharged acts occurring seventeen months after the charged offenses to establish a common plan or scheme. He argues that this evidence was improperly admitted under Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 404(b) and that the judge did not conduct…
Continue reading ›The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, enacted in 1993 under President Bill Clinton, represented a compromise allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals to serve in the U.S. military provided they did not disclose their sexual orientation. This policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted service members but mandated discharge for those…
Continue reading ›If you are accused of domestic violence, assault, or a sexual offense, then your commander will issue a Military Protective Order (MPO) prohibiting you from contacting the alleged victim. As military defense counsel, we at Cave & Freeburg, LLP, have experience with MPOs and problems with them. Also, being given an MPO may be the…
Continue reading ›A court-martial sentenced servicemember has the right to a speedy appeal. The right is based on the Constitution and on various interpretations of military appellate courts like the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. The first and most command barrier to you or your loved one getting a speedy appeal is the failure of the local…
Continue reading ›As military defense lawyers, we at Cave & Freeburg, LLP, along with Brenner Fissell, are representing transgender-plus servicemembers navigating the Trump executive orders. A History of Transgender and Gender Dysphoria Persons in the U.S. Military The history of transgender individuals and those experiencing gender dysphoria in the U.S. military has varied in periods of exclusion,…
Continue reading ›In United States v. Deremer, 2025 CCA LEXIS 46, 2025 WL 427756 (N-M.Ct. Crim. App. 20 Feb. 2025), NMCCA decided that when an alleged victim has an SVC, the MCIO must notify the SVC of any interviews, especially those with intent to interrogate the “victim” about a false allegation. The McOmber rule was based on…
Continue reading ›A convicted servicemember has the statutory and constitutional right to speedy review of their court-martial conviction. Unfortunately, the appellate cases show consistent problems in getting a record of the trial from the field to the court of criminal appeals. Here is a recent example. In United States v. Lathrop, the Army Court of Criminal Appeals…
Continue reading ›Sexual harassment accusations in the military can have severe consequences, potentially leading to criminal charges and court-martial proceedings. As of January 26, 2022, sexual harassment became a specified offense under Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). This change has significant implications for those accused and their defense strategies. Understanding the Charges…
Continue reading ›Statutes of limitations are legal deadlines for filing criminal charges. They are essential because: Statutes of limitations are crucial in preserving evidence and ensuring a fair trial. As time passes, evidence can deteriorate, witnesses can forget details or become unavailable, and memories can become less reliable. This can significantly hinder the fairness of a trial,…
Continue reading ›Reasonable doubt is the fundamental pillar protecting the rights of accused service members in a court martial. It is a legal standard that ensures a fair and just process and safeguards against the potential for wrongful convictions. The prosecutor must prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt, a crucial safeguard against false convictions. The BRD…
Continue reading ›
