United States v. Navarro · ARMY 20250171 · Army Court of Criminal Appeals · March 30, 2026 What Happened An Army Specialist pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography under Article 134 of the UCMJ. His defense lawyer negotiated a plea deal that kept him out of prison entirely. The only punishment: a bad-conduct discharge. No…
Continue reading ›A change to Article 66, UCMJ, has created difficulties in interpreting and applying the factual sufficiency standard of review and in deciding whether a charge should be set aside. Note: this change only affects cases where ALL findings of guilt are based on conduct alleged to have been committed before 1 January 2021. If it’s…
Continue reading ›In re LB, Misc. Dkt. No. 2025-14 Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals — Decided 19 March 2026 OVERVIEW The AFCCA denied all three prongs of victim LB’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed under Article 6b(a)(9), UCMJ, arising from the ongoing general court-martial of TSgt Irvin Bryant Jr. at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. Bryant…
Continue reading ›The First Amendment follows you into uniform, but it does not follow you the same way. Service members who do not understand where the line falls often cross it without knowing—and pay with their careers. This informational post is brought to you by Cave & Freeburg, LLP, at court-martial.com. A soldier posts a video criticizing…
Continue reading ›United States v. Rivera, NMCCA No. 202400304 (Nov. 13, 2025) Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Panel: Senior Judge Gross (author), Chief Judge Daly, Judge de Groot Result: Affirmed What Happened On October 14, 2022, Private First Class Nathan Rivera attended a party at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune. Rivera took two tabs of…
Continue reading ›United States v. Guinsler — Case Summary, prepared by Phil Cave of Cave & Freeburg, LLP What the Court Decided in Guinsler In January 2026, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted Army soldier James Isaac Guinsler on four counts of coercion and enticement of a child and one count of…
Continue reading ›On March 25, 2026, the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued its decision in United States v. Williams-Clark (ARMY 20230185). The court set aside a sexual assault conviction — one that carried a two-year confinement term — not on the merits, but because the verdict itself was fatally ambiguous. The military judge convicted…
Continue reading ›Courts-martial convictions come with a constitutional guarantee: the government must move your case forward without unreasonable delay. When it does not, appellate courts can reduce your sentence or grant other relief. Published March 27, 2026 · Cave & Freeburg LLP The Short Answer Every service member convicted at a court-martial has a Fifth Amendment due…
Continue reading ›United States v. Jacinto — Case Analysis U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces | Decided February 2, 2026 What Happened The Navy court-martialed Aviation Structural Mechanic First Class Salvador Jacinto for sexually abusing his minor stepdaughter, E.B. A panel convicted him of rape of a child and three specifications of sexual abuse of…
Continue reading ›Published by Cave & Freeburg LLP | Military Justice Defense Attorneys Case Citation: United States v. Castillo, No. ACM 40705 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Mar. 11, 2026) | Unpublished A recent Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals decision — United States v. Castillo — raises an important question every military defense lawyer must understand: when…
Continue reading ›
